FATHER STU – Review

Stuart Long (Mark Wahlberg) in Columbia Pictures’ FATHER STU.

Now here’s a new studio film release that seems a perfect fit for this time of year. After a bone-chilling winter, spring has finally, though rather slowly, arrived. For many folks, and nature-enthusiasts, it’s a time of rebirth and renewal. In the latter category, and in the wake of the big “health events”, lots of folks are considering a “do-over” or even a “fresh start”, mainly switching their line of work and professions. This aforementioned new flick has one of the most startling, and radical, “reboots” of one person’s life. A real-life, as this is based on a real person. Oh, and with Easter a few days away, the story will certainly resonate with its focus on faith. That’s because this tale is about Stuart Long, a boxer who becomes the priest known and loved as FATHER STU.


This bio actually begins many years before either profession, as pre-teen Stuart lipsyncs and dances to Elvis in his squalid living room, much to the chagrin of his bitter, boozing, chain-smoking pop, Bill (Mel Gibson). Flash forward to the late 1980s as adult Stuart (Mark Wahlberg), upon the recommendation of his doctor and encouraged by his worrying mother Kathleen (Jacki Weaver) finally puts away his boxing gloves. He stuns Mum with his new career plan: he’ll leave Montana and move to Hollywood to become a “big star”. But “tinsel-Town” doesn’t rush to put him on screen, so he works the meat counter at a grocery store. There he’s smitten by a beautiful shopper. She rebuffs his advances, but he finds a flier for her church that she’s posted on the store’s bulletin board, Though he’s not religious, and not a catholic, Stuart shows up for services and reconnects with Carmen (Teresa Ruiz). While courting her, he also looks up his long-estranged pop, who abandoned him and Kathleen to work construction in California. Then one night after “drowning his sorrows”, Stuart is almost fatally injured in a horrific traffic accident. After helping to nurse him back to health, Carmen finally takes their relationship to the “next level”. Later a very somber Stuart tells her that they “need to talk”. But rather than a proposal, he tells her that he wants to become a priest. But the road to the altar is fraught with spiritual and mental challenges, which are nothing compared to the new physical one that threatens to block his dreams of service to the church.

Wahlberg is in full “endearing average Joe” mode for his take on the much-beloved padre. Unlike his recent UNCHARTED he’s a bit unprepared for life’s curves and for the roadblocks to his goals (stardom, Carmen), but his charm and screen charisma have us rooting for him even as he “gets in over his head” since watching him “treading water” is often compelling. Plus Wahlberg can artistically handle all of Stuart’s story arcs (plural, as I’ll explain later). At the other extreme, Gibson is in his “grizzled, raging curmudgeon” lane, pushing his family and the audience aside, but still giving us a glimmer of hope for Bill’s redemption. Weaver’s the ideal working-class mother, protective of her boy, but not reluctant to challenge him on his often “out there” choices. Ruiz is more than the tale’s “object of affection” as she throws up a steep wall to thwart Stuart’s desires while gradually warming to the stubborn but sincere interloper of her ‘sacred sanctuary”. Plus she’s a very expressive reactor to Stuart’s radical religious interpretations while being baffled and more than a little hurt by his “calling”. And kudos to the casting of screen vet Malcolm McDowell who brings some much-needed gravitas to the role of the church hierarchy that makes Stuart jump through many hoops before allowing him into the seminary.

Rosalind Ross makes her feature film directing and screenwriting debut with this faith-focused saga that should appeal to its intended loyal audiences, though they may be as surprised as I was with the many “F-bombs” scattered about (hence the “R” rating). This may be a leap forward for such films in order to break out of their “specialty” category and “cross over” to more mainstream cinema audiences. Unfortunately, this film plays like a basic cable telefilm, though with more “star wattage”. Actually more like several “overcoming the odds thru suffering” telefilms as Stuart’s many hurtles almost feel like a “dogpile” as each act serves up another “helping of hardship”. Unlike last year’s JOE BELL, we do get to see Wahlberg offering inspirational lectures (the former film always cutaway) and his energy and sincerity shine through. Perhaps because of all these “story beats” much of the relationship drama is scrimped on, especially Bill’s mellowing and the very complex dynamic with Carmen. Maybe a cable or streaming miniseries could’ve “fleshed out” the character studies. Much like the recent DOG, the marketers are selling this as a sweet comedy, but if audiences can handle the truly “tough stuff” (that accident is really excruciating) they’ll enjoy learning about his remarkable fellow. As for “movie-bio” buffs, they may feel the message is often muted in the saga of FATHER STU.

2 Out of 4

FATHER STU opens in theatres on Wednesday, April 13, 2022

TED ( 2012 ) – The Review

A trend amongst feature film directors seems to be a lot more common today. I should specify live-action feature film directors, in that many of the makers of animated features are going on to direct real flesh and blood actors. This is not new since one of the most prolific comedy directors from the late 40’s through the mid 60’s was Frank Tashlin, who directed several short cartoons while a regular at ‘ Termite Terrace ‘ , the home of ” Looney Tunes” and ” Merrie Melodies “. Recently, the results of this big jump have been mixed. The mastermind of several Pixar smash hits, Brad Bird, scored with MISSION IMPOSSIBLE : GHOST PROTOCOL, while another Pixar alum, Andrew Stanton, was at the helm of one of this year’s most notorious flops, JOHN CARTER. And now, stepping into a new arena, is Seth MacFarlane with TED. He’s not made any feature films before, but for the last several years he’s been one of the kingpins of Fox TV animation in prime time with three shows currently in production. Will this new venture attract his rabid TV fan base?

Ted plops us right down into a snowy Boston suburb on Christmas Eve 1985. The next day, youngster John Bennett makes a wish. He wants his favorite present, a cuddly, stuffed bear ( who squawks several different pre-recorded phrases when squeezed ), to come to life and walk and talk on his own. And the next morning the toy, Ted , does just that ( much to the shock of John’s parents ). When word leaks out Ted is a worldwide sensation. But fame is fickle and fleeting. Spring ahead to now. John ( Mark Wahlberg ) is a wage slave at a car rental office with a girlfriend of four years, Lori ( Mila Kunis ) who works at a PR firm and fends off the advances of her lecherous boss, Rex ( Joel McHale ). Oh, and John still has Ted ( MacFarlane provides the modern-day toy’s voice ). When Lori’s away they spend hours sucking on a bong, gobbling up handfuls of dry cereal, and watching their favorite flick, that 1980 cheesefest FLASH GORDON. But now, Lori’s fed up with their antics. John and Ted have to split up and live separately or she’s outta’ there. Will John finally grow up? And how will a talking stuffed bear make it on his own? And what about that creepy single dad, Donny ( Giovanni Ribisi ), who’s determined to give Ted to his equally creepy young son?

Sounds a bit like a TV daytime drama, doesn’t it?  Well I wasn’t surprised when Macfarlane revealed in an interview that Ted originated as a TV series idea several years ago. Several sequences play out as weekly plots ( ” Ted gets a job “, “Ted throws a party”, etc. ), so the storyline is a bit disjointed. I didn’t mind this because when the jokes hit, the movie is gut-bustingly funny. Be forewarned, Ted revels in its vulgarity, but unlike the recent THAT’S MY BOY, the crudeness is presented with flair and style, and…wit.The actors seem to be having a great deal of fun along with the audience. Wahlberg has matured into one of the movie’s most likeable leading men. Good to see him use his comic chops after a delightful cameo in DATE NIGHT two summers ago. Kunis is her usually enchanting, lovely self after elevating last year’s wan FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS. Macfarlane shows his great comic timing as Ted tosses off one great quip after another. And he’s assembled some great familiar TV faces to support the leads, such as Patrick Warburton and Matt Walsh with McHale building on his smarmy small screen persona. Ribisi even scores some chuckles as the film’s big villain ( seems just yesterday that he and Wahlberg faced off in CONTRABAND ). The film could use a good ten minute trim as MacFarlane indulges some of his TV show gag set-ups ( a too long, brutal bare knuckle brawl and, earlier, recreating a classic movie scene -the original’s one of the great movie parodies, so it’s a satire of a satire? ) and a drawn-out final chase, but the stuff that works may have you spilling out into the aisle. TED is a rowdy, coarse, but endearing screen debut of one of the major voices of pop culture today. They may wanna’ check out that talkin’ bear, but please, please leave them kiddies at home! That toy may look cute and cuddly, but TED has got a pretty sharp bite!

Overall Rating: 4 Out of 5 Stars