Check Out The New Trailer For Lionsgate’s CONAN THE BARBARIAN 3D Remake

Watch the full-length CONAN THE BARBARIAN in 3D theatrical trailer. (via Yahoo! Movies)

SYNOPSIS

“I live.  I love.  I slay…I am content.”

– Conan The Barbarian 

The most legendary Barbarian of all time is back this Summer.  Having thrived and evolved for eight consecutive decades in the public imagination- in prose and graphics, on the big screen and small, in games and properties of all kinds- Conan’s exploits in the Hyborian Age now come alive like never before in a colossal 3D action-adventure film.

A quest that begins as a personal vendetta for the fierce Cimmerian warrior soon turns into an epic battle against hulking rivals, horrific monsters, and impossible odds, as Conan realizes he is the only hope of saving the great nations of Hyboria from an encroaching reign of supernatural evil.  

Deftly adapted from the original works of Robert E. Howard and faithful to the mythology and psychology of his iconic character, CONAN THE BARBARIAN stars Jason Momoa, Rachel Nichols, Stephen Lang, Rose McGowan, Saïd Taghmaoui and Ron Perlman. The film is directed by Marcus Nispel, and written by Thomas Dean Donnelly & Joshua Oppenheimer and Sean Hood.

From Lionsgate, CONAN THE BARBARIAN 3D will be in theaters August 19, 2011. Visit the film’s official site HERE and like the film on Facebook HERE.

Watch The CONAN THE BARBARIAN 3D Teaser Trailer

The first official CONAN THE BARBARIAN 3D teaser trailer has debuted via Yahoo! Movies. It was just announced that Jason Momoa will receive CinemaCon‘s Rising Star of 2011 Award for his work in Conan the Barbarian in 3D! The event takes place March 28-31 in Las Vegas.

Synopsis:

The most legendary Barbarian of all time is back this Summer. Having thrived and evolved for eight consecutive decades in the public imagination- in prose and graphics, on the big screen and small, in games and properties of all kinds- Conan’s exploits in the Hyborian Age now come alive like never before in a colossal 3D action-adventure film.

A quest that begins as a personal vendetta for the fierce Cimmerian warrior soon turns into an epic battle against hulking rivals, horrific monsters, and impossible odds, as Conan realizes he is the only hope of saving the great nations of Hyboria from an encroaching reign of supernatural evil.

Deftly adapted from the original works of Robert E. Howard and faithful to the mythology and psychology of his iconic character, CONAN THE BARBARIAN stars Jason Momoa, Rachel Nichols, Stephen Lang, Ron Perlman and Rose McGowan, and is directed by Marcus Nispel.

From Lionsgate, CONAN THE BARBARIAN 3D will be in theaters August 19, 2011. Visit the film’s official site HERE and like the film on Facebook HERE.

Five Actors Better Suited for the CONAN Villain Role than Stephen Lang

The man rocks a mean coffee mug.  That, we cannot take away from the grizzled, bleach blonde Stephen Lang, who thumped Sam Worthington a time or two in AVATAR.  I guess that makes the guy suited to play the villain role, because news broke today over at Latino Review that Lang has been offered the part of the heavy in the Marcus Nispel-directed reworking of CONAN.

What say us?  Well, before we give our own, person opinion, let’s give a description of who the people behind CONAN were looking for.

Khalar Singh is in his 40s to 50s, Asian or Middle Eastern, Central Asian, Mongol, Turkish, or Persian, open to all ethnicities; commanding in size and manner, a warlord and formidable warrior, brilliant, cruel, weathered and tanned by the many campaigns he has waged and won. He is driven in his quest to find the Queen of Acheron and has been building an empire to do so.

Okay, Lang is 57, and he seems like the kind of man who could easily be driven to build an empire under the bones of his crushed enemies.  He also seems like to hear the lamentations of their women, but that’s another story altogether.  What really cries foul in this whole decision and screams of reactive cinema is the second line of description on Singh.  Asian or Middle Eastern, Central Asian, Mongol, Turkish, or Persian.

Stephen Lang is from New York City, and, were it not for the $2.5 billion AVATAR has made worldwide, his name wouldn’t even be in the running for the CONAN Role.  In fact, I would go so far as to say this is probably the worst example of reactive film making I’ve seen in recent memory.  Okay, Michael Bay using “Battle Without Honor or Humanity” to show off the new Camaro in TRANSFORMERS probably beats it, but this is right up there.

Don’t get me wrong.  There is nothing wrong with Lang.  He is a fine actor, and AVATAR along with PUBLIC ENEMIES last year proved he has what it takes to show off his bad ass side.  However, there are fine Asian and Middle Eastern actors out there who would probably be more suited to play the role of a man whose surname is Singh.  Besides, we want Lang free and clear if they ever decide to bring Cable into the X-MEN movies.

Here are just five of those suitable choices:

Tadanobu Asano

Where he is from: Yokohama, Japan

Where you know him: ICHI THE KILLER, SURVIVE STYLE 5+, MONGOL

Personally, who I think would be the ideal choice is a man whose move to high-profile, Hollywood fare I’ve been championing since first seeing him going crazy in Takashi Miike THE KILLER.  Asano has what it takes to play villainous, charming, and absolutely insane.  Plus, as we’ve seen from most of his movies, he has what it takes to stand up to someone like Conan physically.  He’s young.  Asano only turns 38 this year, but, as proven in MONGOL, he wears the weathered look well.  Of course, worry not if you’re a fan of Asano.  He can next be seen in Kenneth Branagh’s THOR, and that’s just about enough to make up for him not getting this part.

Oded Fehr

Where he is from: Tel Aviv, Israel

Where you know him: THE MUMMY (’97), THE MUMMY RETURNS, RESIDENT EVIL: APOCALYPE and EXTINCTION

Okay, maybe not the best choice when it comes to acting ability or in regards to filmography pedigree.  Oded Fehr hasn’t made the best choices in his career, and one has to look at his work on Showtime’s “Sleeper Cell” to see the best acting the man has to offer.  Regardless, he is quite cool, and could definitely teach Jason Momoa a thing or two in the charm department.  He is 39, so that puts him just outside the casting’s age requirement.  Of course, they put the offer out to Stephen Lang.  Their requirements are flimsy at best.

Hiroyuki Sanada

Where he is from: Tokyo, Japan

Where you know him: THE LAST SAMURAI, SUNSHINE, SPEED RACER, “Lost”

Sanada should have broken out a long time ago.  It’s been seven years since THE LAST SAMURAI, and it is still easy to reflect how memorable he was in the small but effective part of Ujio.  Since then, he’s had bit parts here and there, and is more than likely going to achieve some notoriety with his turn as Dogen on this final season of “Lost.”  Of course, Sanada has been acting in film since his tiny part in 1974’s THE EXECUTIONER.  Since then, he has put on around 70 films to his credit.  He would be perfect for the part of Singh.  At 49, he’s in the perfect age range for the part, he’s very cool, and he has proven time and time again he has what it takes both in the acting department and the physical department to bring the villainous role to bad ass life.  Oh, you aren’t sure about the physical side?  Just watch the first 10 minutes of this week’s “Lost”. You will be proven wrong.

Choi Min-sik

Where he is from: Seoul, South Korea

Where you know him: OLDBOY, LADY VENGEANCE

Gotta be honest here, I only know Choi Min-sik from three films, the two mentioned above and TAE GUK GI, but only one of these roles proves he has what it takes for the Singh part in CONAN.  Granted, there probably aren’t any Ace Hardwares anywhere in Cimmeria, so it may be hard for Singh to get his hands on a claw hammer.  Nonetheless, I’m sure Min-sik could find other, more dangerous weapons just as suitable as he found that damned hammer in OLDBOY.  Plus, he took on around 50 or 60 guys in OLDBOY and made it look convincing that he was winning.  I’m sure he would have no issues at all with making Momoa look like a chump.

Shohreh Aghdashloo

Where she is from: Tehran, Iran

Where you know her: THE HOUSE OF SAND AND FOG, “24”, “FlashForward”

Okay, I know what you’re thinking.  This is ridiculous and I must be smoking something very pure if I think Shohreh Aghdashloo would make a decent villain(ess) in the upcoming CONAN movie.  But think of how interesting and different it would be for Marcus Nispel and crew to rewrite the character and make it a female antagonist who has, somehow, built an empire around her shoulders.

Sean Hood was recently brought in to do a fresh rewrite on the screenplay, anyway, and, while he isn’t the last bastion for groundbreaking screenwriting, he could have a few tricks up his sleeve.  Sure, there probably wouldn’t be any hand-to-hand action between Singh and Conan if this were to come to pass, but that’s what henchmen are for, right?  I say screw conformity and go with the freshest and most interesting (not to mention about as distanced from “reactive” film making as you can get) choice imaginable.  Role with Aghdashloo as Singh.  If for nothing else, I just want to see what she looks like with bleach blonde hair.

CONAN is set to begin filming later this year.

Who is CONAN’s Daddy, and What Does He Do?

Look at Mickey Rourke in this picture for a bit.  Almost like a chiseled warrior of old (minus the neon green armbands) looking up to Crom asking why the God has forsaken his only son, CONAN.  This could very well be an image we see again, as The Heat Vision Blog has confirmed what Latino Review scooped last month that Rourke has signed on for the small but important role of Conan’s father, Corin.  Rourke will be joining STARGATE: ATLANTIS’ Jason Momoa who has already signed on to play the titular warrior.

With news also coming down the pike that screenwriter Sean Hood has been brought in to do a script polish, it is looking like the CONAN remake is in full swing.  We won’t hold it against Hood that he also wrote HALLOWEEN: RESURRECTION, CUBE 2: HYPERCUBE, and THE CROW: WICKED PRAYER.  We’ll just let those little blotches on his resume pass by and see what he has to offer on CONAN.

CONAN is set to begin shooting on March 15th under the direction of Marcus Nispel.  Hopefully it’s more TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE Nispel and not FRIDAY THE 13TH Nispel.  Regardless which Nispel we get, I’m betting there won’t be any neon green armbands involved here.

Dolph Lundgren Could Be Headed to CONAN

dolph lundgren he-man

He-Man.  Ivan Drago.  The first Frank Castle.  GR-13.  Whatever you call him, there is no denying how bad-ass Dolph Lundgren is, and, it seems, the world is beginning to realize this fact more and more in recent days.  While it isn’t revealed who he might be playing, Lundgren may be stepping into the world of CONAN, as well.

I’ve talked to the producers about doing something for CONAN.

Lundgren told this to MTV while out promoting his latest film (co-wrote, stars and directs) COMMAND PERFORMANCE.  Lundgren explained that casting was still underway, and a final decision wouldn’t be made until sometime in 2010.   The lead role hasn’t even been cast yet.

Marcus Nispel is directing the film, which is being reported as following closer to Robert E. Howard’s vision of the story than the John Milius-directed film.   Not knowing much about the original, Conan universe, I couldn’t make any kind of suggestion as to who Lundgren should be playing in the new film.   I would, however, love to see him play the villain a la UNIVERSAL SOLDIER.   The thought of He-Man going toe-to-toe with whoever steps into the Conan role gets me very excited for this project.

What do you think?   Who should Dolph Lundgren play in the new CONAN movie?   Should he play a villain or an ally to the title character?   Would it really be all that bad to see Dolph step in as Conan himself?   Shoot us your thoughts in the comment section below.

Review: ‘Friday the 13th’

friday-13th

Melissa:

Finally! A decent horror film! Friday the 13th was way better than I thought it would be… and let me tell you… I was preparing for the worst! Director Marcus Nispel was not my favorite after his remake of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre in 2003. Not to mention that his body of work as a director has been restricted mostly to music videos and music dvds. ( I do give him props for having Faith No More on his list!).

You can’t really go into this expecting it to stray too much from the original formula. Jason drown while camping at Camp Crystal Lake. He then roams the grounds and the woods surrounding, killing all the young folks that are up to some form of crazy shenanigans. No mystery there. I did kind of wish that they would have gone into a little more detail on his childhood. (Similar to Rob Zombie’s reinvention of Halloween). Some more mother/son moments would have been nice. Maybe a little more back story as to how he comes back, of what keeps him alive (or undead).

The first part of the movie definitely had me in suspense. I enjoyed the feeling of tensing up, knowing that something was coming, but not knowing what. I’m not saying that it’ll have you wetting your seat, but I will say that there are some creepy moments. They also stayed true to the campy/ cheesy flow of the films. The actors that they cast are pretty much all disposable. I like that in a horror film. I don’t want to get to know you, begin to like you, and then watch you die. Let’s skip the pleasantries. You stay my acquaintance, it’ll be shocking to watch you die, but I’ll get over it… I’ll be ok.

Ok ladies and gentlemen… let’s talk boobies. You get to see at least (if memory serves correctly) three sets of lady parts during the film, and they are not shy to just whip off their tops with others around. I am not opposed to nudity in horror films. Heck, we all know the rule… if your nude… then you’re dead dude! Here is what gets me… they stack fake orbs on top of ribs. These were the worst fake boobs that I think I have ever seen! It’s like putting bowling balls on Skeletor’s chest!

Overall, I really did like the film. They could be a little more original with some of the slashing scenes, but I think that it’s still chill-worthy. I say go see it!

[Overall: 4 stars out of 5]

Travis:

If you go see this movie with the expectation to see something new and original and unexpected, then you’re shooting yourself in the foot. With that said, I think director Marcus Nispel did a fairly decent job of sticking with the tried and true genre staples that made the original series so much fun. Derek Mears has proven to be a great Jason Voorhees and while the “baghead” look bothered me at first, Jason does eventually find his hockey mask and they did a decent job of introducing that character element quickly and efficiently wihtout it being cheesy.

On the whole, the movie was sterotypical, especially when it comes to the teenager victims. As is the case anymore with Hollywwod horror films, it’s all about the marketing. What I mean by that is that the guys and gals are about as realistic as Ken and Barbie, in every way. The jerks are jerks, the idiots are idiots and the rednecks are rednecks. There are two character elements that stand out. One of them is that the two stoner dudes, who are also the two dudes without dates, are the cool ones and the ones you hope don’t die.

One of the coolest parts of this ‘Friday the 13th’ movie is that it has one of the best opening sequences I’ve seen in the genre for some time. Nothing fancy, just perfect for this movie. You’ll have to watch it to find out what I mean. In addition, you’ll also have to watch the movie to find out what I disliked the most about it, as revealing it would ruin the story. What I can say is my least favorite part involves the biker dude and his sister… end of discussion.

‘Friday the 13th’ managed to keep me entertained and, while it wasn’t scary (aside from a few minor jumps), it was lots of fun. The killing scenes were more humorous in a twisted way than frightening, even more so than in the original series. The script certainly isn’t quality writing, but it has a good dose of humor written into the dialogue. Where it fails is in it’s attempt to “humanize” Jason as something other than an stoppable evil killing machine. Fortunately, the story does end in the only appropriate way. In general, I think this remake should please most fans of the original and of the genre in general, but I don’t think it’s bound for any major following.

[Overall: 3.5 stars out of 5]

Jeremy:

How do you make a remake of a fairly recent horror film and have it be reasonably inventive and suspenseful?   It is possible, folks.   Marcus Nispel’s 2003 version of ‘The Texas Chainsaw Massacre’ and Alexandre Aja’s remake of ‘The Hills Have Eyes’ are great examples of what can be done with a horror remake.

Unfortunately, for every one of these, there are a dozen cheap attempts at restarting a franchise, taking a half-assed script, filling it with annoying characters, shooting it as fast as possible, and slapping a recognizable title it.   You know what?   The new ‘Friday the 13th’ is that in a nutshell.

No suspense.   No intensity.   No genuine scares in the whole movie.   I felt the same way coming out of this film the way I felt when I came out of ‘Cabin Fever’ back in 2003.   Going in I was expecting/hoping for an intense, scare-filled horror film that brought about the best of what made the ’80s horror films such instant classics.   Instead, what I got was stupid characters doing stupid things in a stupid horror film.

Every character in ‘Friday the 13th’ is a stereotype of the genre.   The blonde jerk whose worried about his parents’ cabin.   The comical, Asian guy who seemingly will never hook up with a girl.   The rugged, dark-haired hero on a motorcycle who seems to be the only one who knows something not quite right is going on at Camp Crystal Lake.   There really is not one character in the entire film who goes against type.   The cops and the blonde-haired people are jerks.   If you’re a minority, you’re just around for comic relief.   If you have brunette hair, chances are you’ll be fine, at least until the last third. Basically, the rule seems to be here that, if you’re white and you have blonde hair, don’t expect to be around to see the end credits.

And don’t give me the excuse that it’s “just a slasher film”.   Even films that are “just slasher films” can still provide some level on intensity.   How do they do it?   They change things up a bit.   They either switch things up in the premise of the film or they execute the film with such style that you can’t help but enjoy it on a pure intensity level.

It has way too much humor going on, too.   I can stand a few jokes here and there, but this film is riddled with pot jokes and wacky antics from its characters.   Seriously, with all the t&a and ridiculous humor going on, if it weren’t for Jason walking around hacking people up, you could slap the “National Lampoon Presents” title at the beginning, and it would fit in just fine.

It’s hard to enjoy the film on a purely, goofy level, as well.   Director Marcus Nispel, like his take on ‘The Texas Chainsaw Massacre’, infuses the film with a whole lot of gloss and style.   Whenever Jason is stalking someone or killing someone off, there’s a whole lot of shaky, closeup work going on.   With all the shaky cam, you would think the film would come off as gritty and somewhat realistic, but there is just way too much humor and ridiculous character choices going on to ever consider it realistic.

There’s not a whole lot of blood to go around, either.   Jason’s first kill of the film plays out with Jason running towards someone, a slashing sound, and a cut to black.   Not a good way to kick off your body count.   There are a few inventive death scenes.   They found a way to revisit the sleeping bag death in a fresh way.   For the most part, however, it’s pretty much machete slashes here and there with very little amounts of the red stuff flowing.

There are a handful of things ‘Friday the 13th’ does right, though.   Don’t think that this is a complete waste of time.   Derek Mears seems to be the perfect choice to take over the Jason Vorhees reigns.   This Jason runs, so he has the potential of being even more intimidating that what we are used to with the character.   Here’s hoping Mears sticks around the part for any eventual sequels.

The film also delivers a pretty stellar opening credit sequence.   I won’t give it away, because most of its ingenuity stems from how it plays out.   I will say, however, that it takes a lot of welcomed nerve to do what they did with the opening credits here.

Minus those very few highlights, the film is tediously common.   Jason jumps out, kills someone, cut to different scene, wash, rinse, repeat.   I’m done with the excuse for something like this that it delivers exactly what is to be expected from a film of its type.   ‘Friday the 13th’ is a film that is all about type, but it didn’t have to be.   It could have been scary and intense.   Instead, it’s brainless and routine.

[Overall: 2 stars out of 5]

Two Projects on Marcus Nispel’s Plate

marcus-nispel

Say what you will about his movies, Marcus Nispel (‘Texas Chainsaw Massacre’, ‘Pathfinder’, and the upcoming ‘Friday the 13th’) is one hard working filmmaker. Â  The German-born director recently sat down with Shock Till You Drop to discuss his next two project, both of which are original.

“There’s a movie that I’m interested in. A great movie about cloning, it’s called ‘Immaculate Conception’,”  Nispel told Ryan Rotten, the managing editor of the site. “A girl gets pregnant, doesn’t know why. You think it goes like ‘Rosemary’s Baby’ but it’s not a horror movie, though. You find out that she’s part of an experiment. A splinter group of the church found a rusty old nail in the hills of Golgotha and they’ve harvested the DNA they believe is from Jesus Christ. It’s like ‘Marathon Man’ or ‘Coma’.”

Also on Nispel’s plate is a film he’s been toying with for awhile now. Â  The film’s tentative title is ‘Pod’. Â  “It’s dealing with a huge fascination of mine – the seven sub-levels under Manhattan. When they dig deep they find something they shouldn’t have.”

Sounds like it has the potential of being a pretty decent monster movie. Â  Kind of like ‘The Descent’ under Manhattan.

You can next see Nispel’s directing prowess on display with the proverbial date movie just in time for Valentine’s Day, ‘Friday the 13th’.

Source: Shock Till You Drop

‘Friday the 13th’ Final Poster and Trailer Released

That there’s the final poster for the remake of ‘Friday the 13th’. Â  I’m done with the whole “re-imagining” crap. Â  It’s a remake, okay? Â  Deal with it.

It’s a decent poster. Â  Nothing incredible but atsmospheric enough. Â  I’m really curious to see what Marcus Nispel has to offer the franchise. Â  He directed the remake of ‘Texas Chainsaw Massacre’, and that was one of the best in the long line of recent horror remakes.

Plus, you can check out the full trailer here. Â  It’s exclusive to Yahoo!, but no telling when it will hit theaters.

‘Friday the 13th’ comes out just in time for Lover’s Day, February 13th, 2009.

Source: Yahoo! Movies