DEAD MAN’S WIRE – Review

Dacre Montgomery as Richard and Bill Skarsgard as Tony, in Gus Van Sant’s DEAD MAN’S WIRE. Courtesy of Row K Entertainment

It has been seven years since we saw a film from Gus Van Sant but the director comes back strong with DEAD MAN’S WIRE, an impressive crime thriller/drama based on a bizarre real hostage incident in late 1970s Indianapolis. In 1977, an aspiring businessman, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgard), who felt cheated by his mortgage lender, took the company’s manager hostage, by attaching a shotgun to his neck with a looped wire, while the gun’s trigger was wired to the kidnapper’s body, so that if a sniper killed the kidnapper, the hostage would die too. The method has since called a dead man’s wire. Gus Van Sant uses this real event to craft a tense, thriller film, laced with a dark humor that built on the absurdity of the situation, but also human drama that touches on issues of despair and desperation, economic unfairness, and shady business dealings. DEAD MAN’S WIRE is a technically impressive film as well as working as both a gripping entertainment thriller and commentary on slanted economic system.

Much of this crazy real event was captured on film by news camera, which was shot continuously during the 63 hour standoff with the kidnapper. The engrossing historic thriller is given an authenticity by director Gus Van Sant who captures the feel of 1977, by carefully reproducing the 1970s styles and visual aesthetics of the time period, and most strikingly by recreating the look of TV news and shows of the era, in this film. The visuals so closely match the actual archival footage of the real event, snippets of which Van Sant inserts into his film. The event took place during a transitional moment in how news is covered, and the event is still taught in schools of journalism as an example of news reporting crossing a line to escalate a situation. It adds an eerie level to this already atmospheric, darkly comic thriller/drama.

The film does not condone the kidnapper’s actions but Bill Skarsgard’s masterful performance gives us insights on someone driven to the edge, after being taken advantage of by his unscrupulous, wealthy lender. Austin Kolodney’s script speaks to “Everyman” issues of economic inequality and an unfair system skewed to favor the already rich, a topic that particularly resonates today. There are echoes of DOG DAY AFTERNOON in this film, as well as other “little guy” against the system tales, of someone driven over the edge by circumstances. While DEAD MAN’S WIRE is based on a true story, the drama/thriller goes in unexpected directions, and leans into its dark, absurdist humor at times.

Bill Skarsgard gives a striking performance as the odd, even unbalanced Tony Kiritsis, a would-be real estate entrepreneur who relishes the spotlight, which is part of why this film is so involving.

Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgard) has reached a desperate state with a mortgage he took out from local lender Meridian Mortgage. The mortgage was not for a home, but a business investment in real estate, property Tony Kiritsis hopes to develop as the location for a shopping mall. Tony had lined up plenty of would-be business tenants but he is puzzled as they fade away and he has trouble securing businesses to lease space. Without those funds, he falls behind on payments, and Tony has grown increasingly frustrated in trying to deal with his lender. When Meridian Mortage’s owner M. L. Hall (Al Pacino) offers to buy the property – for far less than Tony paid – Tony begins to suspect it is his own lender who is re-directing would-be leasers to other sites, sabotaging Tony’s business plan.

Tony’s anger and desperation leads to his plan with the dead man’s wire. The original target was Meridian’s M. L. Hall but instead, Tony ends up taking Hall’s son Richard, who also works for Meridian, hostage. Since this is based on a real event, that is not much of a spoiler, as the real big question is what happens next.

The police are alerted and are almost immediately on the scene, but there is little they can do, with Tony’s “dead man’s wire” shotgun apparatus pointed at Richard Hall’s head and the trigger wired to be pulled if Tony falls. Shooting Tony means killing his hostage too. Hence, Tony is able to take Richard to his apartment unimpeded, where he holds him for several days.

Meanwhile, ambitious young Black TV journalist Linda Page (Myha’la), who happens upon the scene, recruits her cameraman and starts filming the events, despite her boss’ efforts to hand off the assignment to a more experienced (and white, male) reporter. Events unfold that also involve at popular radio DJ, Fred Temple (Colman Domingo) known for his philosophical, Everyman musings on the radio. Tony Kiritsis is a fan, and the police try to use the DJ as a way to reach the kidnapper. Cary Elwes plays plainclothes detective Mike Grable, who was first on the scene, and who tries to be a calming figure to establish rapport with the kidnapper.

This bizarre crime and ensuing police standoff takes on a media circus-like air out in the Midwestern city streets, but the film also spends a lot of time inside Tony’s apartment, with just Tony and Richard, who goes by Dick. Holed up in Tony’s apartment, we get to know both oddball Tony and buttoned-down Richard. Dick is very much under the thumb of his wealthy father. M.L. knew Tony was on the edge, yet M. L. deliberately leaves his son to deal with the loaded situation, while M. L. heads out of town, becoming unavailable for any face-to-face. In truth, Richard is as much exploited by his father M. L. as his client Tony is.

As the hostage situation goes on, a kind of cat-and-mouse relationship evolves between the two men, with the more outgoing Tony even becoming rather friendly towards Richard, in a bit of reverse Stockholm Syndrome. But whether that does Richard any good is another matter. Eventually, Tony issues his demands, which include an apology from M. L. Hall personally.

Skarsgard’s outstanding performance is supported well by the rest of the cast, including particularly Dacre Montgomery, who plays the kidnapped banker Richard Hall. All the cast are good, with Colman Domingo another strong character as the DJ drawn into the situation. The wealthy M.L. Hall is played as distracted and distant by Al Pacino, in a strong performance, and there also is a little parallel to the real-life kidnapping of millionaire J. P. Getty’s grandson here, as negotiations begin.

That shotgun wired to hostage Richard’s neck ensures tensions are constantly high, but the quirkiness of the people involved, the unpredictability of both their nature, and the situation, make this a film where you never know what will happen next. None of this goes like the typical movie hostage situation. No character feels that strangeness more keenly that Coleman Domingo’s radio DJ, recruited as a sort of hostage negotiator, a role he’d rather not play. The ambitions of the young reporter, the determination of the cops, led by Cary Elwes’ Mike Grable, to find a way out, and the pressure on everyone of being on camera and in the public eye constantly adds fuel to the incendiary situation. And remember these are real people and real events, something that Van Sant reminds the audience about by inserting actual footage of the real events.

While some may see the film as anti-capitalist, that is not quite an accurate description, as the “common man” at its center is also a businessman, even if he is not too successful. Instead, DEAD MAN’S WIRE, in part, is more commentary on the warping of the American Dream and the old American free enterprise system, an aspirational ideal in a post-WWII world marked by the Marshall Plan, but which came to a crashing end in the “greed is good” 1980s. The old free enterprise system promised a level playing field for even small businesses to compete fairly, and succeed through hard work and good ideas, rather than through a “thumb on the scale” and unscrupulous, deceitful practices. Kiritsis’ his lack of success is not due, per se, to lack of skill in business, but by the tilted playing field upon which he treads, ironically being skewed by his own lender, who in a more ethical world be his ally. Instead, his banker is concealing that his thumb is on the scale, and has plans to turn his client’s misery to his advantage. The film’s themes are less anti-capitalist than anti-unscrupulous, a condemnation of predatory business practices, contrasting human dealings versus dehumanized practices, the latter style one which Al Pacino’s morality-free character represents well.

Gus Van Sant’s DEAD MAN’S WIRE is highly entertaining as a crime thriller, as well as a technically impressive film, and enhanced by first rate performances particularly by Bill Skarsgard in what may be a career best, as well as working as historical drama and commentary on a slanted economic system.

DEAD MAN’S WIRE opens in theaters on Friday, Jan. 9, 2026.

RATING: 4 out of 4 stars

BARRON’S COVE – Review

A scene from BARRON’S COVE. Courtesy of Well Go USA

The intense drama BARRON’S COVE opens with the gruesome death of a young boy, Barron, when the prank pulled by a couple of his “friends” goes horribly awry. The perps deny any knowledge of what happened. Caleb (Garrett Hedlund) is the grieving father who smells a cover up when the local authorities dismiss it as a suicide, so he starts going all Bronson on those who oppose his efforts to uncover what really happened. His ex-wife blames him for failing to pick their son up after school. He blames his uncle (Stephen Lang) who runs the construction supply business that employs Caleb as hired muscle for collections and contract ”compliance” among his clientele. That’s who demanded he perform one of his typical bullying tasks that made him late for his son.

Caleb demands the truth from one of the playmates, Ethan (Christian Convey) – a wretched brat who happens to be the adopted son of the politically ambitious scion of the region’s most powerful, influential family. Caleb goes off the rails over the lack of answers, spurred greatly by Ethan’s rather psychotic response to all questions. Desperate for answers, Caleb kidnaps Ethan to scare the truth out of him. It does not go smoothly. As the hostage hiding and sweating situation progresses, a raft of dirty secrets, side deals and betrayals unfold. Violence occurs; more is threatened.

Hedlund gives an excellent performance, showing the thuggish and sympathetic sides of Caleb’s nature convincingly throughout his emotional roller coaster of discovery. Convey starts out as thoroughly despicable before showing what may or may not be an element of vulnerability. He keeps us guessing. Lang is his usual hard-nosed evil self; he does boss-bully as well as anyone in the biz. Hamish Linklater turns in a very credible stretch from his usual nice-guy roles.

Cruelty towards children – however well-deserved it may seem in context – will be hard for many to watch. Otherwise, it’s a fast-moving, suspenseful action tale that navigates those waters capably.

BARRON’S COVE debuts on Blu-ray and DVD through Amazon from Well Go USA on Tuesday, August 5, 2025.

RATING: 2 out of 4 stars

A WORKING MAN Review

Jason Statham as Levon Cade in director David Ayer’s A WORKING MAN. An Amazon MGM Studios film. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Amazon MGM Studios. © 2025 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

I’m always excited about the opening of a new Jason Statham action flick. A WORKING MAN is directed by David Ayer, who had just collaborated with Jason on last year’s excellent BEEKEEPER thrill-fest. It’s co-written by Sylvester Stallone, who (to my surprise) has 44 feature screenplay credits under his Rocky Balboa title belt, mostly for films he starred in. Them ain’t been none too high on brain fodder, but they reliably delivered the desired level of adrenaline boosting.

In this one, Statham plays a former super-soldier running a construction crew for a cozy family business owned by Joe Garcia (Michael Pena), assisted by his collegian daughter Jenny (Arianna Rivas). When Jenny is snatched from a nightclub for unknown nefarious reasons, Jason has to kick-start his old particular set of skills to rescue the lass.

What follows is the accustomed path of working his way up the criminal food chain to save the girl while wiping out a slew of evildoers along the way. This entails deployment of feet, fists, some big knives, a helluva lotta guns, two grenades and a bomb. Unfortunately, the bomb isn’t IN the script. It IS the script.

For all the rounds of ammo fired, the bullets leave fewer holes than the plot. The details are too aggravating to enumerate. If you see this turkey anyway, take a note pad to keep track of them for some fun. Or wait for the streaming release, gather some pals and make it a drinking game. Down a shot every time something doesn’t make sense. No one will be able to drive home safely.

The action sequences were terrific in BEEKEEPER. But this one isn’t nearly as Statham-y as that was. Too much shooting, without his usual screen time of masterful hand-to-hand. Even worse, the choppy edits and dark settings made those clashes less exciting than one should expect from Ayers and Statham.

A couple of possible explanations come to mind. Perhaps Jason was ill or injured and they couldn’t find a stunt double who could adequately match his looks and moves. Or maybe the lighting crew went on strike, and they had to film without enough illumination. The sound was no bargain, either. Much of the dialog was hard to understand because of mumbling or background noises. That may have been a blessing, because the stuff one could hear wasn’t very engaging.

The structure of the story and the makeup of the eponymous hero were pure Statham – the elements that have made him a long-running star, thriving ever since his trio of TRANSPORTER flicks. But the execution here lets him and his fans down. Badly.

A WORKING MAN opens in theaters on Friday, Mar. 28.

RATING: 1 out of 4 stars

THE WEDDING GUEST (2018) – Review

Spring arrived (finally) just a few days ago, so what better time for a flick about one of the season’s most frequent events and celebration, a wedding. From the title, we gather that it must be a “rom-com” romp with all the chaos and confusion associated with “tying the knot”. And since it comes from writer/director Michael Winterbottom, the man who helmed that hilarious THE TRIP trilogy and stars the energetic Dev Patel from the Marigold Hotel movies, it’ll have lots of laughs and warmth (maybe Coogan and Brydon will cruise in). Well, you’d be mistaken if you gathered all this from the title, or to quote one of the better songs from MARY POPPINS RETURNS, “The Cover is not the Book”. No, this is an Eastern trek into classic film noir territory as we strap ourselves in for a road trip with THE WEDDING GUEST.

Said title character is a British-raised Indian Muslim named (well, it’s what he answers to) Jay. As we meet him, he’s just flown into Pakistan, informing the authorities that he’s going to a wedding. He proceeds to rent a car for two weeks (perhaps turning the trip into a vacation). Jay then stops off in a small dusty village to purchase two pistols (uh oh), then buys a roll of “very strong” duct tape (double uh oh). A few miles up the road he parks his car and rents another one (wha-) and completes the trip to the wedding locale, an opulent estate outside another tiny town. After renting a room, Jay embarks on his trek’s true mission. Evading the gate guard, he climbs the fence, enters the home, and abducts the intended bride, Samira (Radhika Apte). A flash of violence complicates Jay’s plan, but they make it back to his vehicle. After tossing her into the trunk (she’s bound, gagged, and hooded) they speed away into the night. Making it back to the first rented car, Jay lets Samira out of the trunk and informs her of the plan. If she wants to go through with the nuptials, he’ll leave her by the side of the road near town. But if she wishes to be reunited with her London love, Deepish, he’ll take her to him in India. Samira chooses the ladder, and after a quick clothes change, they head across the border to India. But things soon go “sideways” as Deepish (Jim Sarbh) gets “cold feet” when the big “bride-napping” makes the news. But Samira insists on seeing him, and Jay just wants to get paid for the job and its “complications”, one being the attraction between abductor and captive. And what was the couple’s big “endgame” involving Deepesh’s family business of precious gems and stones? Will this triangle take a deadly turn?

The lead role is a big departure for the usually sunny, cerebral star of this dark tale. Patel (who’s also one of the film’s producers) embraces that darkness giving us a determined calculating criminal-for-hire, one hoping to avoid violence but is prepared, nonetheless to strike first in order to survive and collect his bounty. Jay is a mystery, a man full of contradictions, stopping off on the way to the job in order to do his daily prayers, then quickly back in his deadly “professional duties”. Has he always done this “sort of thing”? Where did he acquire these “special skills”? We, along with the other characters, never find out, as Patel builds a secretive, protective wall around Jay. And Patel is completely believable in this complex, but brutal role. Now what Jay is not prepared for is the alluring Samira played by Apte unlike a typical noir “dangerous dame”. She slowly turns from timid captive to calculating partner, knowing that her face and name are all over the news. Apte, through her large expressive eyes, conveys Samira’s almost fear of Jay morph into an emotional bond. Of course, much of this is escalated by her weasel of a longtime beau Deepesh played with an oily arrogance by Sarbh. He’s a smooth-talking wild card, showing his “true colors” when things go awry. Sarbh’s so convincing that we wonder what Samira ever really saw in him. This is one twisted talented trio.

Winterbottom has concocted a unique crime thriller that’s mixed with a “budding friendship” road picture. As mentioned earlier it’s an exotic spin on the classic noir films with plenty of double and triple-crosses and a tough, rough, “all-business” pro whose “hard edges’ slowly soften via a very smart ‘skirt”. The suspense builds from the mysterious first act as we’re pondering the motives of Jay as he gathers his “tools”, finally exploding in the nearly botched mansion invasion and “grab”. From there’s it becomes almost a “travelogue’ as we view the gorgeous locales from all manner of transportation (cars, trains, even a “sleeper” bus) and accommodations (from “dirty dives” to swanky plush suites). This builds to the inevitable meeting of the three principals, which, as feared, quickly goes “south”. And as James Cain reminded us, “The Postman always rings twice”. Though the plot has familiar elements, the cast and settings make THE WEDDING GUEST an engaging “slow boil”.

3.5 Out of 5

THE WEDDING GUEST opens everywhere and screens exclusively in St. Louis at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinemas and Tivoli Theatre

SHOPLIFTERS – Review

Once again a lauded international filmmaker is taking an unfiltered look at family life. You might think that I’m talking about the current awards “darling” ROMA from director Alfonso Cuaron, in theatres and streaming on Netflix (really). No, this new film may be giving it some competition in the Best Foreign Film category (it has snatched up the prize in a few festivals and year-end critics group awards). Oh, this film is set in modern times, is in color, and its setting is half the planet away. And the ROMA family is, at least, upper-middle-class. These folks, well, definitely lower, much lower. This Tokyo-based clan truly struggles to survive and provide. That’s the main reason (along with misfortunate and misery) this family becomes SHOPLIFTERS.

As we meet two of them, the aforementioned crime is well in progress. “Papa” Osamu (Lilly Franky) and nine-year-old Shota (Kairi Jo) are roaming a grocery store, stuffing food into their clothing as they act as “lookouts” for each other (and distracting the clerks and managers). As they head home they notice a familiar sight. A sweet-faced five-year-old girl named Yuri (Miyu Sasaki) is alone and neglected, sitting in the cold patio outside her apartment. Fearing for her safety, Osamu impulsively reaches in and takes her with them (thinking that a hot meal will help before bringing her back). This causes quite a ruckus in the squalid tiny apartment that the duo shares with “Grandma'” Hatsue (Kirin Kiki), “Mama” Nobuyo (Sakura Ando), who works at a dry cleaners, and nineteen-year-old Aki (Mayu Matsuoka) who spends her days as a “hostess” at a “gentleman’s private club”. Actually, Hatsue is the main provider as she receives a monthly pension check via her late husband and a regular “gift” from the offspring of the woman who was her late hubby’s second wife. Plus the apartment is in her name only, so they all have a “hiding plan” in case of a visit from the landlord. Life becomes direr as Osamu is injured on the job at a construction site (no insurance, of course) and Nobuyo is let go (after she’s rifled through the pockets of all the clients’ clothes). After discovering some suspicious scars, Yuri becomes a part of the “family”, and soon the local media reports of her “kidnapping”. She’s quickly given a new name and haircut, and to Shota’s chagrin, trained in retail thievery. When a heartbreaking tragedy occurs in the household, a hard decision is made that further puts everyone at risk. Will the authorities discover their actions and break-up the loving, but illegal household?

Writer/director Hirokazu Koreeda touches upon several themes of friendship and family he explored previously in AFTER THE STORM and the unexpected charmer OUR LITTLE SISTER (which was based on a popular manga-style graphic novel). The superb camerawork conveys the near-claustrophobic living conditions in just one or two rooms that seemed to be constantly caked with grime and grit. Still, there’s a sense of mystery and wonder in these muddy back alleys and ramshackle confines. Even in the daylight hours danger hangs heavy in the air as Shota and his different “aides” try and slip past the unaware shopkeepers. Despite the title, the family (especially Shota) has a “code of honor”, perhaps to justify their actions. They believe the things they take out of bins and shelves don’t belong to anyone until purchased (twisted logic, eh). Luckily the young lad’s eyes are finally opened when a line is crossed (a bit of B and E). Koreeda guides the great ensemble expertly, with Kiki terrific as a tough and cynical matriarch. Franky is a clown full of pathos, yearning to connect with his “kids”, while Ando, as his partner, seems more world-weary than her “Grandmama”, her eyes dulled by disappointment. The most tragic may be Matsuoka, who is pinning all her hope for the future on a handsome and wealthy young “patron”, thinking that he will be the “Prince Charming” to whisk her away from the filth and famine. Yes, the story is sympathetic to these criminals, but their activities are never played as noble (other than the rescue of Yuri) or fun. And the pacing drags a bit, making us wish for a fifteen or twenty trim to tighten the story’s flow. But this is an engaging look at the class system of a different culture and how families are formed and survive. Plus it helps that these SHOPLIFTERS are also scene stealers.

3.5 Out of 5

SHOPLIFTERS opens everywhere and screens exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinemas

ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD – Review

 

Christopher Plummer as J. Paul Getty, in Ridley Scott’s ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD. Photo courtesy of TriStar ©

Everyone recognizes that hoarders have a psychological problem but what if the thing that is hoarded is money? Ridley Scott’s ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD tells the true story of the 1973 kidnapping of the grandson of oil magnate J. Paul Getty. The event was one of the most infamous scandals of the decade, because the notoriously miserly Getty was then the richest man in the world yet declined to pay the ransom he could easily afford.

This strange-but-true story is part crime thriller and part psychological family drama steeped in obsessive greed. Based on real events and people, director Scott made some changes made for dramatic effect, rearranging events in time, or combined or compressed them or fictionalized others. The kidnapping dragged on for months and some of the most bizarre events in the film really happened, sometimes were even more strange than depicted. The two of the most mind-boggling events, Getty’s refusal to pay the ransom and the incident with the ear, are true.

In making his drama about the Getty family crisis, Ridley Scott was faced with a crisis of his own. when the actor cast as billionaire J. Paul Getty, Kevin Spacey, was embroiled in his own scandal. To save his Oscar-hopeful film, Scott made the bold choice to re-cast the role with Christopher Plummer and re-shoot, not digitally alter, the 22 scenes Spacey appeared in during nine days filming in November to still try for a late December release. Ridley Scott made the release date window, and the film may be even better for the casting change.

Christopher Plummer does a bang up job as the elder Getty, and since he is much closer in age to the 80-year-old oil tycoon, it meant that he did not have to endure the same kind of make-up transformation Spacey needed, making it more convincing casting. But the real central figure in this thriller is not the billionaire but his ex-daughter-in-law Gail, played marvelously by Michelle Williams, the mother of the billionaire’s kidnapped 16-year-old grandson.

As Gail repeatedly notes, she is not a Getty but her son certainly is one. Living in Rome with her three other younger children, Gail Harris Getty (Williams) rarely sees her wild-living teen-aged son, who goes by the name Paul (Charlie Plummer, who is not related to Christopher). Divorced from drug-addled J. Paul Getty Jr., who goes by the name John (Andrew Buchan), she and her son have no access to the Getty money. But the kidnappers don’t know that when they snatch Paul off the streets.

When the teen is kidnapped, there is a suspicion it is a hoax, since Paul sometimes joked about extracting money from his fabulously rich but famously cheap grandfather. But the kidnapping is real and the kidnappers send a letter demanding a ransom of $17 million dollars. With no real funds of her own, the boy’s desperate mother Gail is forced to ask his wealthy grandfather to pay. When the billionaire refuses, Gail has no choice but to find a way to change his mind. Meanwhile, the elder Getty sends his head of security, ex-CIA agent Fletcher Chase (Mark Wahlberg), to find the kidnappers and try to get the boy back without the ransom.

The irony is that at the time of the kidnapping, the older J. Paul Getty was not only the richest man in the world but the richest man in the history of the world at that time, the world’s first billionaire. Yet he not only loved making money, he hated spending it, obsessively hoarding it.

The cast also includes Timothy Hutton as Getty’s coldly efficient lawyer Oswald Hinge and French actor Romain Duris, who plays Cinquanta, one of the actual kidnappers who developed a sympathy for the kidnapped boy in disgust over his grandfather’s cold-hearted refusal to pay. That character is one of the many strange-but-true aspects of the film. The unlikely ex-CIA security expert Mark Wahlberg plays is also a real person, who was an even odder character than the one in the film.

Ridley Scott does a fine job recreating the 1970s time period and the lavish world Getty inhabits in his English mansion, as well as the media hysteria that surrounded the kidnapping. But the acting is the strongest point of the film. Michelle Williams really excels as Gail, the outsider to the Getty family’s madness and money, representing a normal person’s point-of-view. She is the emotional heart of the film, a mother who will face anything to save her son, and the sane contrast to the insane mix of money, addiction, power and compulsion. Plummer is chilling as the controlling tycoon, whose attachment to money is as much an addiction as any to drugs. Young Plummer does fine, but the role is largely limited to having the kidnapped boy look miserable. Duris is memorable as the kidnapper and Mark Wahlberg is good casting as the security expert.

The kidnapping dragged on for months, which allows the film to develop the dynamics of the Getty family. The danger ratchets up further when members of a Mafia-like organized crime group become involved. After the kidnapping takes place, Gail is pursued relentlessly by the paparazzi, willing to do anything to get a photo for the juicy story, which reflects the reality of the time.

Getty’s money obsession is illustrated in a scene where Plummer explains the damp laundry hanging up in his very posh hotel room to his daughter-in-law Gail (Michelle Williams) by noting proudly that he is saving the cost of room service. This bizarrely Scrooge-like behavior is Gail’s first introduction to the father-in-law she never met, from whom her husband J. Paul Getty Jr. (Andrew Buchan) had long been estranged. The younger Getty was wary of his controlling father but with four young children, the couple decides to ask him, not for money, but just for help finding a new job. The older Getty welcomes the return of his son, gives him a job heading the Getty Oil Company’s Italian division in Rome, and seems particularly taken with the grandson who also bears his name. But there is a high price for his help.

Some details are real but others are enhanced for dramatic effect, Getty was indeed famously penny-pinching and he really did have a coin operated pay phone in his mansion, as we see in the film, although he later removed it. However, he did spend lavishly on some things, particularly art and women, and did marry five times.

ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD is an intriguingly bizarre true crime story but it is not a perfect film. The pacing sometimes sags and the film seems to switch from an unsettling psychological drama to an action crime thriller towards the end, in which Williams and Wahlberg team up to chase down the kidnappers. The facts around the real kidnapping are so odd that it takes some fact-checking to separate far-fetched fiction from strange real events, but detailing which scenes are which would just create spoilers.

The film’s real strength lives in the performances, led by Michelle Williams’ Oscar-worthy one as the level-headed, grown-up woman caught up in the Getty family’s toxic relationships, and trying to save her son in an era where women were routinely dismissed. Christopher Plummer’s turn in the much smaller role as the miserly tycoon is also gaining awards buzz.

ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD is worth the money, for the strange true story but especially for Michelle Williams’ and Christopher Plummer’s fine performances.

RATING: 4 out of 5 stars

THE HARVEST (2013) – The Review

theharvest_image

At one time or another, we’ve all felt we’ve had the worst parents in the world. We have our reasons, but watch THE HARVEST (2013) and you’ll quickly reevaluate your thinking. The question arises… what is a child’s life worth and how far will you go to save that life when certain death rears its unfriendly head?

THE HARVEST tells the story of a seriously ill boy named Andrew, bed-ridden and bored out of his mind. He’s not allowed to leave the house, play baseball, have friends or go to school, and is barely allowed to leave his room. Andrew, played by Charlie Tahan, is weak and can barely stand on his own, but he still has desires just like any boy his age. These desire have been successfully subdued by his over-protective, borderline psychotic mother Katherine, played by Samantha Morton. Then a misunderstood, rebellious girl his age named Maryann moves into her grandparents’ house nearby and changes everything.

Maryann, played by Natasha Calis, doesn’t waste any time exploring and looking for some way to entertain herself in this secluded area, tucked away in the woods. This is how she happens upon Andrew’s house where the two quickly develop an awkward but empathetic friendship of kindred spirits. For the first time, Andrew actually appears to be experiencing some level of happiness, that is of course, until Katherine discovers the existence of Maryann, which had prior been kept a secret.

IMG_8443

THE HARVEST is set almost entirely inside or in the immediate vicinity of Andrew’s home. What Andrew’s house may lack in physical size, it more than compensates with the size and severity of its secrets. With Andrew basically confined to his bed in his room, the house is essentially a prison. Katherine, a medical doctor by profession, is obsessed with curing her son’s ailment at any and all costs, which serves as her prison. Andrew’s father Richard, played by Michael Shannon, is also a prisoner, but his confinement is his hopelessly lost marriage to his mentally unstable wife Katherine.

Written by first-timer Stephen Lancellotti, THE HARVEST is a passionate film steeped in fear, guilt and lies kept by every major player in the film. The emotional scale of the film tilts heavily toward the darker, unsavory elements of humanity. Despite this, Lancellotti’s strong, well-written characters hold the otherwise excessively depraved nature of the story together, keeping Andrew’s world from crumbling around him until the very end. This is most clearly illustrated in Michael Shannon’s surprisingly subdued performance as Richard, a man so beaten-down by his wife’s insistence on being a controlling emotional mess, that he can often barely speak or move in her presence.

Richard is not a coward, but he is weak. Having left his career to stay home and take care of Andrew while Katherine works, he has but a single purpose that drains his very essence, and yet Katherine will not even allow him to fully embrace this role. Other weaknesses of Richard’s emerge in the film, but they all tie back into his desire to do right by his son, however he must. Sadly, that often means protecting and supporting Andrew against his mother’s abrasive, even violent behavior spawned from a truly demented sense of ensuring her’s son’s well-being.

IMG_9769

Samantha Morton delivers a performance so absolutely frightening that the concept alone of their being a real life Katherine out in the world somewhere alone sends chills down my spine. On the most primal, stripped down level, her heart is in the right place, but the manner and methods by which she pursues saving her son’s life are so utterly deplorable that virtually every moment she is on screen is cringe-worthy. Consider Kathy Bates’ performance as Annie Wilkes in MISERY (1990) and then notch that sucker up to 11 on the bone-tingling terror scale.

Andrew’s helplessness is made convincing by Charlie Tahan’s performance, not just in the physically demanding nature of the role requiring him to appear weak and broken, but in his emotional state and virtually non-existent level of energy. In pulling this off, Tahan only increases the next-level insanity that emerges from Morton’s performance. Meanwhile, Natasha Calis is perhaps the most normal and well-rounded character in the film, despite her own demons, which are relatively minor in comparison to Andrew’s. Finally, for good measure, McNaughton throws a familiar seasoned favorite in the mix with Peter Fonda playing Maryann’s grandfather. While his role is rather small, he does provide a crucial line of dialogue in the film that, for Maryann, serves as the equivalent of Uncle Ben telling Peter Parker “with great power comes great responsibility.”

John McNaughton is a filmmaker of notable cult status, but many of you reading this are scratching your heads, I am sure. Having made his mark early in his career, McNaughton is best known to true horror movie aficionados for HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER (1986), his debut film that also introduced Michael Rooker to movie audiences, who is now something of a household name amongst The Walking Dead fans.

Well-known for the gritty, faux-documentary style of his feature film debut about what makes a killer, McNaughton takes a sizable step away from that visual style. The film still has a hint of that voyeuristic element, but its subtle and will go mostly unnoticed. I realize how strange this will sound, but THE HARVEST actually conveys more of a prime time Hallmark family movie night vibe to its visual style, with its contemporary, shot-on-digital video looking, real life drama sort of stuff, that actually adds to the creepiness of what takes place.

McNaughton is no stranger to delving into projects that develop as much controversy as they do cult following, such as MAD DOG AND GLORY (1993) and WILD THINGS (1998). I feel this will not be an exception to that rule and I am certainly grateful for McNaughton sticking to his guns. I will end with this… if you are not even a little bit afraid of Samantha Morton after seeing this film, please do me a favor and never introduce me to your mother.

THE HARVEST opened in New York on April 10 and is available on VOD now.

The film opens in Los Angeles this Friday, April 24th at the Arena Cinema in Hollywood.

Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

theharvest_poster

GRACELAND — The Review

graceland-2013_img

Drafthouse Films does it again, scouring, quite literally, the entire planet for the very best films otherwise virtually unseen by the majority of film goers. In an ongoing effort to bring powerful, hard-hitting films closer to the forefront, GRACELAND caught the attention of savvy film enthusiasts and now has the opportunity to spread its wings amidst a larger audience. Will you be one amidst those many?

GRACELAND tells the story of a working class father, and honest and good young man named Marlon Villar, played by Arnold Reyes. Set in the Philippines, Marlon finds his world thrown into chaos when a kidnapping goes terribly wrong and he finds himself fighting for his daughter’s life. Torn between his love for his own family and the demand placed upon him by his employer, Marlon must juggle a dangerous balance between doing what’s right and doing what he must.

Written and directed by Ron Morales, a filmmaker of respectable technical talent, GRACELAND marks only his second feature film as a director. Having earned his industry chops working on more mainstream Hollywood fare, from SPIDER-MAN 3 to NICK & NORAH’S INFINITE PLAYLIST, its clear that his wide exposure to various styles and genres has allowed him to find his own much more pure artistic vision.

Marlon encounters elements all too familiar, from corruption to class segregation, all of which play into the overall arc of the film that proves not to be a sum greater than its parts, but an experience of which the parts and the sum are of equally high value. GRACELAND catches us off guard, nudging us off the curb into the filthy gutter, drags us through Marlon’s agonizing ordeal, and then just when we thing Morales is going to lift us up out of our shallow grave, instead he throws a few more shovels of dirt on our heads. Why? Because the truth is, real life is rarely about perfect happy endings. Real life is twisted, bent and jaded.

Forget about the flashy, high-action kidnapping films like TAKEN that are short on plot. GRACELAND never sacrifices its heart for a quick and easy adrenaline fix. On second thought, let me retract that statement. Instead, let me say that GRACELAND relies on masterful storytelling and a potent story with more resonant real-world issues to slowly fill the viewers veins with an adrenalized rush. As a suspenseful tale of a man desperate to save his daughter, GRACELAND matches the bar. As an emotional, intelligent case study of life in a world few of us will ever dream of actually stepping foot into, this film will knock you on your ass.

Morales maintains a close and personal vantage point, often uncomfortably so, never allowing the viewer to pull away and remind themselves “hey, this is only a movie.” Even in the films’ opening moments, Morales already has us hating a key character, while empathizing with Marlon and the nauseatingly disgusting situation he is in and must face on what seems a daily basis just to make ends meet. Its this dichotomy of Marlon’s restrained morals and the requirements of his job that give us hope that he will somehow find a way out of this mess.

GRACELAND co-stars Menggie Cobarrubias as the corrupt Congressman Changho and Dido De La Paz as the corrupt detective Ramos. Both men have their flaws, but at varying degrees and with subtly contradicting lines in the sand. Changho represents the “upper class” of the Philippines, fitting as his role takes something of a backseat to that of the detectives, who serves as a sort of intermediary between the very small upper class and the vast lower class. GRACELAND is a gritty, dirty looking film yet also manages to capture a certain untarnished beauty in the way the world looks around Marlon. Morales portrays things as they are, for better or for worse. At times, it even seems perhaps that shots may not have been authorized, perhaps even captured at great risk to the filmmakers themselves. All of this adds to the tension, builds layers upon layers onto the texture of the film. This allows the viewer to get a little dirty. We need to feel some of that to fully appreciate the cinematic environment in which the story is told.

In the end, no one character is quite what they seemed in the beginning. In the end, GRACELAND has us playing everything back in our minds, looking for explanations and justifications. In the end, the truth is that a father will do whatever he must to protect his family and damn anyone that wants to tell him what’s right and wrong in the eyes of those who haven’t walked in his shoes. However, in the end, all actions also have their consequences. GRACELAND is available on VOD/iTunes now and opens in theaters on Friday, April 26, 2013. Be sure to visit the official GRACELAND website for more information and to find a screening near you.

Overall: 4 out of 5 stars

graceland-2013_pstr

A LONELY PLACE TO DIE – Fantastic Fest Review

UPDATE: Sean Harris was awarded Best Actor in a Horror Feature at the Fantastic Fest 2011 Awards for his performance in A LONELY PLACE TO DIE.

A LONELY PLACE TO DIE is an exciting example of how a more direct approach to filmmaking can still be effective, despite the increasing number of stylistic and experimental films (not necessarily a bad thing) flooding the market. Melissa George (30 DAYS OF NIGHT, and TV’s Grey’s Anatomy) plays Alison, on a trek into the Scottish Highlands with four fellow mountain climbers. The story begins as a peaceful nature outing far from civilization and technology, but shifts into a deadly thriller once they discover a little girl named Anna locked away inside a 3×6 buried box at the top of the mountain.

Co-written with Will Gilbey and directed by Julien Gilbey (RISE OF THE FOOT SOLDIER), A LONELY PLACE TO DIE does a fantastic job of introducing the audience to the Scottish Highlands, an geographical locale I don’t believe I’ve ever seen on film in such glory. Beautiful cinematography from Ali Asad and breathtaking aerial photography combined with a great traditionally-influenced score from Michael Richard Plowman give the best of National Geographic a run for its money. Gilbey spares nothing while convincing us that these climbers are for real, as is the danger of climbing.

The relative serenity of the high altitude wilderness is abruptly broken by the mystery of the girl in the box. With our focus entirely shifted, the rugged pristine landscape now serves as an obstacle as Alison and the most seasoned climber Rob (Alec Newman) set out on a treacherous shortcut to reach help as the other three climbers escort Anna along a safer, but lengthier route into the nearest town. Now begins the chase.

In a similar approach to films like HARD TARGET, the antagonist’s of A LONELY PLACE TO DIE are patient, experienced hunters who track the two groups, picking them off, one by one. Discovering the connection of the antagonists to Anna is not a complicated mystery, but who the little girl is becomes a relatively important element latter in the film. At this point, A LONELY PLACE TO DIE has fully transformed into a survival story, but just beneath the genre skin is actually a story about selfless, personal sacrifice in the face of mortal consequences.

The pace of A LONELY PLACE TO DIE increases ten fold once the chase begins, making the better part of the film a slight contradiction to the title, but I interpret the title as a direct reference to the box buried at the top of the mountain. The rather lengthy chase and hunt portion of the film is extremely entertaining, but is not terrible unique on it’s own. This second act of three, however, continues to spiral deeper and darker into the source of all the carnage. By this point, we’ve already bought into the unnamed hunters’ cold, calculated methodology. The Hunters are portrayed with spine-tingling ease by Douglas Russell and Alan Steele, each pursuing their brutality from an equally disturbing but opposite angle.

Opposite our villains, we’re introduced to supplementary heroes led by Darko (Karel Roden). These black ops for hire characters serve a questionably significant role, as they enter into the story at roughly the moment the film begins to lose some of it’s steam. A LONELY PLACE TO DIE is a powerfully demanding thriller steeped in realism, but suffers primarily from one flaw… an uncertainty on when to end the story. Personally, I would have liked to see the film end at what I consider the first stopping point, but I’ll leave this decision for you to discover and decide on your own.

If you’re a fan of thrilling mountaineering dramas like NORTH FACE or documentaries like TOUCHING THE VOID, be sure you take the time to check out A LONELY PLACE TO DIE once it hits US theaters on November 11th, 2011.

Fantastic Fest 2009: ‘Cropsey’ Review

cropsey

Cropsey is an urban legend from Staten Island NY. The villain changes from wielding hooks to knives to axes but the outcome always ends with children getting cut up into tiny pieces and buried in the woods. The legend spread and documentary film makers Joshua Zeman and Barbara Brancaccio both thought that maybe the legend is there for a reason… maybe it’s real.

Cropsey dives into this mystery by questioning whether or not a series of missing kids over the course of 20 years is what spawned the legend. The possible perpetrator of these kidnappings and murders is Adrian Rand, a man who used to work in an insane asylum for children in Staten Island. After a really big news expose’ by Giraldo Rivera in the 1980s the asylum closed and Rand was  left without a job, roaming the woods around the “school”.

Sadly the film doesn’t really stick with the legend of Cropsey much more than saying they all grew up with it. Instead the film boils down into whether or not Rand is really this murdering sociopath. We meet the parents of the kids, families that looked for the bodies of the kids, and more. It’s a truly creepy and disturbing story and you will get sucked in.

Without the initial premise though, this film is really just a documentary that could be on any crime channel. It doesn’t elevate itself beyond a tv doc level.