Cruise and Abrams Reteaming for ‘Mission: Impossible 4’

cruise abrams

It looks like J.J. Abrams’ love for the Summer gold isn’t subsiding any time soon.  It has just been announced that he and Tom Cruise will be reteaming for ‘Mission: Impossible 4.’  The two have agreed to co-produce the film, which Paramount is looking to potentially have into theaters by Summer of 2011.

‘Mission: Impossible 3,’ which was the first time Cruise and Abrams worked together, raked in$134 million in domestic box office, a long way from the $180 million the first one made and the $215 million the second one made.  Regardless, ‘Mission: Impossible 3’ was a huge hit overseas, pulling the film’s total, worldwide box office to just under $398 million.

There is no word on who will direct, though it will likely not be Abrams.  Whispers of the ‘Star Trek’ sequel with a potential release date of Summer 2011 will probably keep him too busy to helm ‘M:I 4.’  Who knows if he will direct either sequel?

Different scenarios arise as to what the storyline could possibly be for ‘M:I 4’ and what Cruise’s role will be in the film.  As soon as we hear anything, we will be sure to let you know.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter

JJ Abrams talking with Tom Cruise about ‘Mission Impossible 4’?

missionimpossible41

Empire news is reporting(via TV Guide Magazine) that Tom Cruise has been talking to JJ Abrams about coming back to do MI4. It would mark the only director to do a ‘Mission Impossible’ installment 2 in a row if they does sign on for it.

Here is what Empire posted about it:

Abrams reveals that he and the Cruiser have come up with “a really cool idea” and says that he’s “incredibly honored” to have been invited back.

It seems unlikely that Abrams would return to the franchise (of which he directed the really rather good part 3) as director though. A producer credit is more likely, leaving directing duties up for grabs. As producer, Tom Cruise’s previous modus operandi for the series was to give each episode a particular director’s stamp: hence the very stylistically different series entries from Abrams, Brian De Palma (part 1) and John Woo (part 2).

I wouldnt mind a 4th because I still really dig this franchise, especially if Abrams is on board to do it. What do you guys think?

Discuss: The Kirk/”Sabotage” Connection

trek-sabotage

Editor’s note:   This is not something I came up with on my own.   I’m kicking myself in the ass that I didn’t, but, once it was brought to my attention, I felt I had to comment on it.

One of the questions fans and dissident’s of J.J. Abrams’ ‘Star Trek’ film alike have been asking themselves (and others) is why, oh why, would a Beastie Boys’ song be included on the soundtrack?   For those who have not seen the film, and don’t have a problem with a little, tiny spoilage, the first time we see James T. Kirk as an adolescent (12 years old, to be exact), he has stolen his stepfather’s antique car.   He clicks on the futuristic radio, complete with touch-screen, and “Sabotage” kicks in.

Many have commented on how this introduction of such a popular, modern song takes them out of the film.   Personally, it put a smile on my face, as, evidently, Beastie Boys’ popularity is still strong hundreds of years in the future.   Kirk’s stepdad must have it programmed to some futuristic NPR station where they play influential classics from a bygone era.

It’s a fun, little scene, and the sound of a modern, rhythmic beat makes it all the more fun, but who knew there might, actually have been a deeper meaning.   Why did Abrams choose that song?   Some people have said that, if they had to use a Beastie Boys’ song (they didn’t have to), “Intergalactic” would have been a much more appropriate choice.   This isn’t necessarily true.

Why?   Well, let me answer that question with another question.   Did you know that William Shatner has a minor issue with the way he says the word “sabotage”?   If you listen to Howard Stern, surely you’ve heard the clip of Shatner berating the director of a recording for a Star Trek audio book.   Shatner says, “Spock, sabo-taj the system.”

The director corrects him.   Shatner responds with, “I don’t say sabotage.   I say sabo-taj.”

Just listen for yourself, and see other examples of Shatner’s complete butchering of one of the most basic of words:

I mean, he’s William Shatner.   He can say whatever the hell he wants, right?   After that little recording session, that audio director fell into obscurity.   Shatner went on to win Emmies, Golden Globes, and Razzies.

Well, now comes the really hard question.   Did J.J. Abrams, or even Roberto Orci or Alex Kurtzman, for that matter, use Sabotage as a deliberate nod to William Shatner’s stubborness on this matter.   With all of the other Easter eggs that seem to be strewn throughout ‘Star Trek,’ you certainly can’t put it past the people behind the film to throw this little nod in, as well.   It’s a little more buried and subtle than most.

However, if it is deliberate, it could be one of the more ingenius references seen recently.   It’s certainly a helluva much better Easter egg than seeing Deadpool reach for his disembodied head.   Sorry, that was another spoiler, but I’m not too worried about it.

Source: Topless Robot

Review: ‘Star Trek’

startrek

The Summer movie season is poised for launch, and JJ Abrams and crew are about to light the fuse.   ‘Star Trek’ is the perfect movie for this time of year, an epic, sci-fi escapade that brings all sorts of escapist fun into theaters.   It’s got action.   It’s got laughs.   It’s got romance.   Well, a little romance, and not from where you might expect.   But, what’s most important, it’s got brains.

Now, before you think you’re going in to see the $250-million version of ‘Primer,’ let me stifle those belief right now.   This isn’t the most ingenius storyline to come down the pike.   But, where ‘Star Trek’ succeeds where so many, other, big-budget, Summer movies fail horribly, is in the tightly wound ways screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman flesh out the characters.

No one gets lost in the mix.   Everyone has their respective moments to shine.   If you’re favorite ‘Star Trek’ character growing up was Sulu (played here by John Cho), fear not.   He gets his moment.   Same goes for Chekov (Anton Yelchin), Uhura (Zoe Saldana), Scotty (Simon Pegg), and McCoy (Karl Urban).

The film’s lead characters, Kirk and Spock, played by Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, respectively, clearly have the most amount of screen time, and it’s odd to think that one got billing over the other (Pine over Quinto here).   However, don’t think that just because the driving forces behind the film are Kirk’s destiny and Spock’s logic vs. emotions conflict, this means the other characters in the film get any kind of short-change.

Orci and Kurtzman do an incredible job at taking us back to these characters in their earlier days, long before the Tribbles or Khan showed their faces.   They do two things with their screenplay.   They set it up so that the film can rest gently in with the established canon of the ‘Star Trek’ universe, and they also create a world where anything can happen.   I’m sure Trekkies all over the galaxy would have issues with certain liberties the screenplay takes with the characters and events depicted.   However, all of that naysaying can be brushed aside.

The amazing opening sequence of the film quickly introduces us to Nero (Eric Bana), the villain of the film, who has traveled back in time through a black hole to take on some kind of revenge.   He seeks Mr. Spock, and we get a quick glimpse of the man he is searching for.  Ã‚   It is Leonard Nimoy, the man Quinto will grow into.   After a few introductions, Nero unleashes his strength, and what ensues is both eye-opening and grin-inducing.   With that opening scene, Summer officially kicks in.

We are shown early moments from Kirk and Spock’s childhood.   On their respective home planets, they ready themselves for adulthood, each one in his own way.   Jump forward a number of years when each one is about to join Starfleet Academy (although Kirk doesn’t know it just yet).   I was worried with a “prequel” to the ‘Star Trek’ series and films, Orci and Kurtzman would write a ‘Harry Potter’-esque film that showed the characters going through school, taking classes on warp drives and speaking Klingon.   Fortunately, the screenwriters and Abrams know how lame this would have been, and the storyline instantly progresses three years to when the cadets get their first assignments.   Enter the USS Enterprise.

Orci, Kurtzman, and Abrams never let the film lag, nor do they ever allow the film to fall into ridiculous moments of either hilarity or over-the-top action. Â  We get subtlety with our big-budget bravado in ‘Star Trek,’ and that is something more Summer movie filmmakers should attempt to accomplish. Â  Much of this is found in both the film’s visuals, which are shocking in how grand they are, and the sound.

This is some of the best sound design work heard in recent years, and sound effect editor David Barbee and legendary sound designer Ben Burtt deserve mentions here. Â  The sound in ‘Star Trek’ knows exactly what to do and when to do it. Â  It cuts out in the dead of space (something I, shockingly, don’t remember seeing since ‘Robot Jox’) and it revs up and kicks in at the most perfect of times. Â  If you are anywhere near an IMAX, this would be the ideal way to see this film for the sound effects alone.

This isn’t to say ‘Star Trek’ is the picture perfect film that goes without issues. Â  There are issues here, particularly with the convenience factor. Â  There are a number of times where elements occur just for the sheer sake of driving the plot, and, during such moments, you can practically choke on the deus ex machina.

An issue that I have always had with ‘Star Trek’ and ‘Star Wars’ alike is how small the universe appears to be despite being made up of hundreds of planets each home to billions of beings. Â  In all this vastness, it still amazes me that two characters having connections to the same story can just bump into one another. Â  A certain Disney theme park song just popped in my head, and I hate it.

Another issue with ‘Star Trek’ is the finale that doesn’t seem quite as grandiose as you would expect given how the film opens. Â  Much of this is in how Bana’s Nero is fleshed out. Â  We understand his pain, and we know full well why he is seeking the revenge that he is seeking. Â  However, there seems to be something missing, and much of this can be found in the way Nero never has a dual side. Â  He is hatred and scowling through and through, and, in the end, that ends up hurting the character.

Despite these minor setbacks, ‘Star Trek’ is an absolute thrill-ride of a motion picture, the kind of big-budget yet story-driven spectacle that needs to be seen more than once. Â  With this new introduction to these characters, Abrams has officially revitalized a franchise that had grown hokey and stale in its later entries. Â  This is ‘Star Trek’ at its coolest, at its best-written, and, certainly, at its biggest. Â  It’s the kind of Summer blockbuster that you should definitely run to see.

Kirk out.

Overall: 4.5 stars out of 5

WAMG Gets Fan’s Reactions to ‘Star Trek’

star-trek-spock-kirk

I attended the second Saint Louis screening of ‘Star Trek’ last night and got a few opinions from fans afterwords. Personally, I felt J.J. Abrams did an amazing job, but listen to what these three fans had to say. I especially appreciated Rosemary’s willingness to talk with us. She is an 80-year young Trekkie who has been watching ‘Star Trek’ since it began in the 1960’s. Watch our video below to hear what Rosemary had to say about the new film.

Stellar Scores Sail in for ‘Star Trek’

startrek

I have my inner Star Trek female geek at full phasers this week. After WAMG’s were treated to the early screening of Paramount’s continuing cash cow ‘Star Trek,’ I had a delightful feeling of dà ©jà  -vu. I was a  sophomore in high school, back in 1982, when ‘Star Trek: Wrath of Khan’ was released into theatres. ‘Khan’ encompassed everything that made me a die-hard “Trekker” and is, without a doubt, the best of all the Trek films. From its beautiful, haunting James Horner score, the Enterprise filled with naval sounds and her crew all dressed as midshipmen, a smart script filled with well-placed classic, literary lines like Spock’s one of sacrifice “It was the best of times….It was the worst of times” and Khan’s vengeful “From Hell’s Heart I stab at Thee,” and finally the Spock death scene played out to its “logical solution.” Sigh!   After coming out of this weekend’s screening, I had that same exact euphoric rush and it made me fall in love with ‘Star Trek’ all over again. Thanks J.J. Abrams for the brilliant casting and warping us back to classic Trek!

Our Oscar friend, Sasha Stone, over at “Awards Daily” has posted the first trade reviews and they’re all stellar…The two biggest industry trade papers have given it, “two perfect scores of 100.” Virtually unheard of in the early days of the summer blockbuster season.

The Hollywood Reporter:

Paced at warp speed with spectacular action sequences rendered brilliantly and with a cast so expert that all the familiar characters are instantly identifiable, the film gives Paramount Pictures a new lease of life on its franchise.

Variety:

Blasting onto the screen at warp speed and remaining there for two hours, the new and improved Star Trek will transport fans to sci-fi nirvana. Faithful enough to the spirit and key particulars of Gene Roddenberry’s original conception to keep its torchbearers happy but, more crucially, exciting on its own terms in a way that makes familiarity with the franchise irrelevant, J.J. Abrams’ smart and breathless space adventure feels like a summer blockbuster that just couldn’t stay in the box another month.

‘Star Trek’ is receiving a 100% on Rotten Tomatoes thus far and I dont see that changing drastically in the upcoming week before the film’s release on Thursday evening. EW has  graced the the cover  with a ‘Star Trek’ article in this week’s Summer Entertainment Guide. Do yourself a favor and see it on the big screen opening weekend with what will undoubtedly be a cheering crowd!

‘Star Trek’ will be Plastered Everywhere!

startrekimage

The newest installment in the ‘Star Trek’ franchise is on it’s way, thanks to sci-fi fanboy and producer/director J.J. Abrams. Just in case no one has heard about the new movie, a massive marketing campaign is under way to ensure not a single person ends up asking “wait, there is a new Star Trek movie?”

You’ve already seen the trailers and TV commercials, but keep an eye out for Star Trek to appear on virtually every facet of you daily life. An estimated $50 million marketing partnership will be unveiled featuring some well-known advertising icons that have been Trekked Out.

Included in these icons are Kellogg’s Tony the Tiger, Burger King’s freaky King mascot and Erin from Esurance, all of whom will appear in Star Trek themes advertising. Tony the Tiger, for example, will be throwing up “Live Long and Prosper” signs and Kelloggs will be placing beam-up badges into boxes of cereal, including Apple Jacks and Fruit Loops. There’s even going to be limited edition boxes of cereal containing Starfleet insignia-shaped marshmallows. Good luck getting your hands on these however, as I predict Trekkies will be buying them in droves, never to be opened.

Burger King, along with cellular giants Verizon and Nokia, have shot commercials and are using actual sets and crew members from the movie. Burger King will obviously be venturing into marketing territory in it’s restaurants with movie-themed cups, toys and kid’s meals. Esurance will sponsor a ‘Star Trek’ movie night at AT&T Park for a San Fransisco Giants game as well as other sporting events.

Who knows what else will pop up? Kelloggs is going to be one of the most visible partners. They are also planning in-store displays of movie-themed packages for popular items including Pop Tarts, Eggo Waffles, Cheez-Its and Keebler Cookies, featuring sweepstakes, swag giveaways and movie ticket offers.

So, prepare yourself for Trek-overdose as we venture closer to it’s release in theaters on May 7/8, 2009. I’ve already predicted that ‘Star Trek’ will be the biggest grossing movie of the summer and it appears Paramount and their marketing partners are banking on that.

[source: Hollywood Reporter]

‘Star Trek’ Release Pushed Up by About Five Hours

star-trek2

While not just a huge jump back, fans won’t have to miss any work the next day due to going to ‘Star Trek’ midnight shows. Â  Paramount has decided to release the film at 7PM on May 7th instead of the typical midnight, May 8th release most Summer blockbusters get.

This is becoming the new trend for these blockbuster releases. Â  Last year, both ‘Iron Man’ and ‘Kingdom of the Crystal Skull’ got released a day in advance. Â  This gives the film a running start towards the weekend and generally works in the studio’s favor.

‘Star Trek’ is listed as having a running time of 126 minutes, so, counting an actual midnight show, that gives the film three screenings on the 7th before launching full-force on Friday.

Source: Coming Soon

New clip from ‘Star Trek’ hits

A pretty cool new clip has hit the web from ‘Star Trek’ and so it begins. From here on out we wont be able to log on to the web without a new clip, and by the end we might be able to scrape together 35 minutes of footage, just like ‘Watchmen’ but we will see. Check it out below:

Keaton (Diane) and Goldblum Join ‘Morning Glory’

diane-keatonjeff-goldblum

I know. Â  When I saw that Keaton and Goldblum had joined ‘Morning Glory,’ I thought, “OMG! Michael Keaton and Jeff Goldblum, together at at last. Â  Bruce Wayne and Ian Malcolm are gonna kick some ass!” Â  Then, I realized ‘Morning Glory’ already had Harrison Ford on board, and my childhood nostalgia almost caved in my skull just from thinking about it. Â  Then, I realized something else. Â  It’s not Michael Keaton. Â  It’s Diane Keaton.

Okay. Â  Two out of three ain’t bad. Â  We still have Goldblum and Ford together in the same picture.

JJ Abrams is producing this film about  an aspiring news producer (Rachel McAdams) who tries to save a failing morning show by getting control of its feuding anchors. Ford and Keaton will play the dueling on-air personalities. Goldblum will portray McAdams’ boss.   I think I’d rather see Keaton play the boss and have some on-screen sparring between Ford and Goldblum.

Roger Michell (‘Enduring Love’ and ‘Changing Lanes’) is taking director’s duties when the film begins production next month in New York. Â  My dreams to see Jeff Goldblum and Michael Keaton in a buddy-cop movie live on.

Source: Variety