LAMB – Review

Alright kiddies, time to gather around the fireplace for another magical fairy tale. Oh, scratch that, this is a movie so you’d need to gather not around but at the local movie theatre or multiplex. And one more thing, this story’s similar to a bedtime tale, but it’s really not for the “wee folk” (unless you want them to cease slumbering for a long time). Now, it is set in a faraway, but very real, land though it may seem that it’s on the edge of the “Twilight Zone”, or perhaps “Castle Rock”. Oh but there are some cuddly animals in the story which is certainly reflected in its simple title, LAMB.

That faraway place is Iceland, and in the opening minutes it’s living up to its name. A herd of small wild horses is tromping through a blinding white landscape. They slow as the leader of the group spies something as his eyes widen. That’s when they suddenly change course, dashing away in the opposite direction of…something. Flash forward to warmer times as the story focuses on a married couple who live and work on a desolate farm. Maria (Noomi Rapace) and Ingvar (Hilmir Snaer Gudanson) barely interact as they work the fields and tend to their sheep, the tiny AM radio as their only background noise. As one of the sheep goes into labor, the duo head into the barn to assist in pulling out the new arrivals. Days later the herd becomes agitated, their cries awaken the couple. Returning to the barn Maria aids in a new birth, but this is quite different. She and Ingvar immediately wrap up the lamb in a blanket, taking it away from its mother as they rush back to their house. They begin raising the lamb as their baby, letting it sleep in an old crib. This causes the mother sheep to stand by the backdoor, bleeting for hours…until Maria “takes care of it”. The next big arrival is Ingvar’s neer’ do well aspiring singer, brother Petur (Bjorn Hlynur Haraldsson), whose former bandmates dumped him along the road. He is stunned when he sees the new “lamb-child” (a true WTF moment), but he soon settles in to be of temporary help to the couple. Unfortunately, he lusts after Maria (behind Ingvar’s back). But he’s not the only disruption to the dreary routine. Odd noises shatter the tranquil night (though the sun remains out), while their trusted border collie goes missing. Are they being targeted by a mysterious unknown entity, one that may be connected to their “son”?

A talented cast greatly helps in bringing a sense of real drama to the story’s more whimsical aspects. Rapace makes Maria perhaps the most complex and conflicted character of the tale. In the opening sequences the “farmer’s wife’ is simply “going through the motion”, seemingly stuck in “auto pilot’ as she runs the tractor and boils an endless supply of potatoes and beef. Then with the “miracle” Rapace shows us that the light in Maria’s eyes quickly flicker back to life. It’s as though the “mother switch” has been activated, one that also prompts acts of cruelty. Her passion for her hubby is also back, though she half-heartedly deflects the advances of her brother-in-law (in the words of Indiana Jones, “How hard were you trying?”). And in one scene we get a look at the sadness she has tried to suppress, much as Ingvar has. Gudnason as the quiet farmer also sleepwalks through his work and marriage until the “event” jolts him back to reality. He’s quite a contrast to his gregarious brother Petur, who becomes the audience surrogate thanks to the charming work by Haraldsson. He’s just like us when he sees the astounding new family “addition” (the biggest laugh in the somber film), and he even conveys a real “sweetness’, despite his lustful actions.

First-time feature director Valdimar Johannsson creates an uneasy feeling of tension that permeates every scene. The isolation and constant sunshine add to an other-worldly aura that may send the principals into madness, or at least some very poor choices. The script that he co-wrote with Sjon does feel like a modern-day fable, even a cautionary tale, along the lines of “Tom Thumb” via “The Monkey’s Paw”, as a wish is granted, but one with dire consequences. And while such an achingly quiet setting and very stoic characters might send viewers’ minds adrift, instead we’re drawn into this world, so alien yet earthbound. What helps to “sell’ this bizarre “concept” ? I’d offer kudos to a very talented team of artists, with several CGI teams credited along with a throng of puppeteers. Part of me is interested in seeing some “making of” doc-style footage, while another part of me doesn’t want to “peer behind the curtain” and spoil the “magic”. Adventurous film fans were be rewarded for their patience as many scenes will “haunt your dreams” (much like THE WITCH a few years ago). Plus the “outta’ nowhere” ending will keep you in your seat for most of the end credits. LAMB is a nightmarish adult fantasy and a compelling cinema experience.

3 Out of 4

LAMB is now playing in theatres everywhere

WOMAN AT WAR – Review

Halldóra Geirharðsdóttir in WOMAN AT WAR, a Magnolia Pictures release. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

In the Icelandic film WOMAN AT WAR, a lively, independent middle-aged woman named Halla (Hallora Geirhardsdottir) lives a double life: as choral director with a secret identity as an environmental activist known only as “Woman of the Mountain.” In her secret identity, Halla uses her skill with a bow, like a real-life Katniss Everdeen, to knock out power lines. Her goal is to disable an aluminum smelter owned by multinational corporations, who plan to bring in more polluting heavy industry to Iceland.

After one attack on the power lines, Halla nimbly makes her escape across a starkly beautiful landscape. She passes by the three-piece band that has been providing the music for her daring action, although she doesn’t seem to see them. The police, hunting for the saboteur, stop a hapless Spanish-speaking bicyclist who happens into the area. When the young bicyclist tells them he’s a tourist, the police snap back that this is not a “tourist area” and arrest him. Meanwhile, Halla makes her escape with a little help from a sod farmer and his dog named Woman.

Quirky, yes, but this comedy/drama/thriller also has a lot of heart and considerable entertainment. Nordic countries have a knack for this kind of film – quirky, darkly comedic, slightly surreal, but with underlying serious meaning, and it seems that knack extends to Iceland.

WOMAN AT WAR features very nice photography that highlights the natural beauty of the Icelandic landscape, as well as its attractive modern architecture. There is a lot of music in this film, provided by that band that keeps popping up along with a trio of female singers in traditional garb. The musicians seem to follow Halla around, unseen by her or anyone else.

When next we see Halla, she looks totally different. Elegantly dressed, she arrives at a sunlight-filled, high-ceiling hall in a community center to lead the rehearsal of a community choir.

Halla is an idealist, whose sunny apartment’s walls are adorned with pictures of Nelson Mandela and Gandhi. Turns out, she has done this kind of thing more than once, and she is not alone in her clandestine efforts to derail the efforts of a global corporation to partner with the Icelandic government to bring in more heavy industry. Even some government officials are are part of her environmental push-back.

As her efforts have escalated from petty vandalism to industrial sabotage, she is careful that no one is injured and only the multinational corporation behind the aluminum plant she opposes suffers financially, although some people are inconvenienced. She believes she wants what is best for her country and the global environment, and that what she is doing will help. The plan is to slow down the joint multinational-governmental effort, while building popular opposition.

But things do not go as planned, and life adds complications. The film is one that continually takes viewers by surprise, with unexpected warm and poignancy. Halla’s supreme confidence in herself and what she is doing it shaken by unforeseen events, making her re-evaluate life view.

This is a well-crafted film with sure direction by Benedikt Erlingsson. It is also lifted by magnificent cinematography, and a part thriller, part personal drama story, that is sprinkled generously with dry humor. It is the kind of film that never goes where you expect yet takes you on a rewarding journey.

One of the strengths of this film is Hallora Geirhardsdottir in a double role as Halla and her twin sister. Geirhardsdottir’s sensitive performance takes us inside the head of a woman driven by a cause who goes on a personal journey that shakes up her life yet brings her to a life-affirming place. The rest of the cast are good as well but the greatest weight falls on Geirhardsdottir, and she is splendid.

Nothing quite goes according to Halla’s plan nor according to our expectations, which are often upended until WOMAN AT WAR makes its way to its surprising yet satisfying conclusion.

WOMAN AT WAR, in Icelandic with English subtitles, opens Friday, March 15, at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinema.

RATING: 4 1/2 out of 5 stars

ARCTIC – Review

Mads Mikkelsen in ARCTIC. Photo courtesy of Bleecker Street.

The Arctic is among the most extreme environments found on earth, at the limits of where mankind can survive. The film ARCTIC focuses on one man marooned in that environment, spinning a deeply human tale of survival in the harshest of wildernesses. The drama/thriller is also a tour-de-force performance by Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen, in a nearly wordless minimalist adventure of endurance.

This is not entirely a “man alone in the wilderness” tale, although Mikkelsen’s character Overgard starts out alone. It is the appearance of another person, injured in a helicopter crash, that sends him on his journey.

With Mikkelsen’s remarkable performance, ARCTIC is about as good as it gets for man in the wilderness drama, at least of the frozen variety. The snowy landscape has an austere beauty but the sense of cold seeps into your bones watching his ordeal crossing the icy terrain. Only the human warmth of the character’s concern for this charge breaks the chill.

Shot on location in Iceland in a remote volcanic plateau, with an experienced Icelandic crew, the harsh conditions shown reflect the reality of the challenging locale. Director and co-writer Joe Penna, who wrote the script with Ryan Morris, thoroughly researched arctic survival, consulting with pilots, survivors and experts, to add a sense of gripping reality to the film. The story is fictional but also universally true as a picture of extreme survival.

Sweeping vistas of the snow-covered rocky landscape adds to the drama and gives the film a striking visual style, well used by the director and cinematographer Tomas Orn Tomasson. The screen is filled with white snow, gray rocks and blue sky, against which we see Overgard in his red coat as a small figure struggling.

When we first see Mads Mikkelsen’s character, he is engaged in some mysterious task, digging in the snow with improvised tools. Zooming out to a high, wide shot reveals he is working to maintain a large SOS he has scratched out in the snow. Stranded by a plane crash, Overgard seems to have been waiting for rescue for sometime. We do not see the crash, only the wreckage of the small plane, as we follow him through what looks like a well-practiced routine of daily life and survival as he awaits rescue. We learn nothing of who he is or why he was in this remote landscape. There is no voice-over, no flashback, just Mikkelsen’s actions and occasional words. Yet what is happening is crystal clear.

Mikkelsen’s Overgard has worked out a routine to survive, living on fish he catches with baited lines dropped in holes cut in the ice. His distress signaling device is positioned on a small hill near his wrecked plane and he climbs to the crest daily to hand crank a generator to send the signal. He appears to be the only living thing around, until a paw print and a smashed cooler reveal the presence of a polar bear.

When rescue finally seems to arrive in the form of a helicopter, it is plagued by bad luck in the form of bad weather. The helicopter that has responded at last to his distress signal is brought down by high winds in a storm. One of the two people in the helicopter is killed but the other survives, a young woman (Maria Thelma Smaradottir) who was injured in the crash. With practical discipline, Overgard scavenges what he can from the crashed helicopter and takes the injured woman back to his plane.

His joy at seeing another person is obvious. Although he speaks to her in English, her response indicates little grasp of the language and the markings on the helicopter suggest she may be Southeast Asian or maybe Korean. Still, it gives him hope that rescue for them both is on the way. But it becomes clear the woman is not doing well and Overgard is forced to act to try to save them both.

Overgard’s touching care for this stranger as well as his practical approach to the daunting task of survival are moving and gripping. At 98 minutes, the film is the right length for this tale of human endurance in a frozen wilderness. Mikkelsen gives an outstanding performance, both portraying Overgard’s resourcefulness and determination, and his touching human concern for this helpless stranger.

As good as Mikkelsen is in it, the film is limited by the man-versus-nature genre itself. The story is direct and minimalist, based on human courage in extreme conditions, and it is to the director’s credit that it keeps that simplicity. Given the kind of story it is, this is not a film for everyone, although it is as good as any of the type. Watching Overgard’s ordeal, and knowing what actor Mikkelsen had to endure to film in that harsh locale, is likely to make one grateful for central heating at the very least.

ARCTIC is a well-done, spare survival film graced with haunting Icelandic vistas and stunning location photography but mostly worth seeing for Mads Mikkelsen’s outstanding performance. ARCTIC opens Friday, February 22 at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinema.

RATING: 4 out of 5 stars

LAND HO! – The Review

landho

What land does the title refer to, you may ask? Why, it’s Iceland, of course. Now, that’s a trip and a half! This film continues the comedy traditions of a couple of “fish out of water” foreigners having a wacky adventure on foreign or unfamiliar soil. That set-up may have been best exploited by comic Bob Hope and crooner Bing Crosby when they crisscrossed the globe from 1940 to 1960 in the seven films often referred to as the “Road” pictures. Most recently British comedy stars Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon hit the road for the hilarious TV show and film THE TRIP (looking forward to THE TRIP TO ITALY in a few short weeks). The new film LAND HO! gives that idea a fresh twist by using documentary techniques and by making the two travelers a bit…well quite a bit, older. While most men of their age are settling in for retirement, these duffers are ready to explore! Cinema ho…!

The heroes of this flick couldn’t be more different, a true “odd couple”. What brought them together? They married sisters. The loud, burly, gravelly voiced, Kentucky-born Mitch (Earl Lynn Nelson) is a retired doctor who divorced his wife several years ago. Soft-spoken Aussie Colin (Paul Eenhoorn), former musician and bank manager, is a widower from his first marriage (to Mitch’s ex-sister-in-law), and has just gone through a nasty divorce from wife #2. When Colin pays a visit to Mitch’s backwoods estate, the old pal surprises him. Mitch has arranged a trip to Iceland for just the two of them, and he’s picking up the tab. Colin protests, the forceful Mitch persists, and soon they’re on the distant island. Over the course of the next few days the explore nightlife in Reykjavik when Mitch’s college-age once-removed cousin and her girlfriend have a flight layover, and then the two men rent a hulking SVU and drive to exotic locals, cold mountains,  hot springs, and encounter the colorful locals and other tourists.

And that’s really it. A senior vacation actually. But the film makers did have me going for a bit. For a good while I thought a documentary crew was following these fellas around. That is until the situations became a tad contrived. Many scenes seemed improvised in a “lets’ put the boys here and see if something finny happens” way. I couldn’t buy them tromping through a local art gallery, stopping to comment on every piece. And other bits such as the guys getting “glo-stix’ from a woozy club kid or Mitch trapping two newlyweds in a lobby never really pay off and are stiff and stilted. The same could be said for the “cuz” and her pal, particularly when she tells a ghost story that seems to go on and on and…Perhaps this may be due to the main characters. A little of Mitch goes a long, looong way! At times Nelson plays him as a stereotypical “ugly American’ who just cares about getting drunk and scoring weed and ladies. He’s so loud and aggressive we begin to feel sorry for Eenhoorn’s Colin who’s often trapped by the big guy, usually just rolling his eyes silently. After a time we get frustrated with him wishing he’d stand up and speak out, perhaps even paying a penalty to get an earlier flight out of there and away from him. The scenery is lovely, but eventually we get the feeling that this is a glorified travelogue (a popular short subject format from the 30’s and 40’s) or, dare I say it, a thinly disguised infomercial! Nothing really terrible happens to the men because of the locals, plus there seemed to be lots of tourism folks in the end credits. So if you’re into the “far away places with strange-sounding names” you might enjoy LAND HO! But don’t be surprised if you reach for your imaginary remote to fast forward past the clunky comedy and awkward exchanges in order to see those gorgeous mountains.

2 Out of 5

LAND HO! screens exclusively in the St. Louis area at Landmark’s Plaza Frontenac Cinemas

landhoposter