Review
THE MAN WHO INVENTED CHRISTMAS – Review
Dan Stevens gives a frenetic performance as Charles Dickens racing to finish writing “A Christmas Carol” in time to publish before the holiday, in THE MAN WHO INVENTED CHRISTMAS. Directed by Bharat Nalluri (MISS PETTIGREW LIVES FOR A DAY), this film has all the Christmas color and Victorian period costumes and sets you could want in a Christmas film. The film is mostly a clever way to retell the famous tale, as characters spring from the author’s imagination while he struggles with his own family issues and races to meet a pre-Christmas release deadline, but it also touches on how his short novel transformed a once-minor holiday into the tradition we know today.
People can hardly conceive the idea that Christmas was not always celebrated as the major holiday it is today, but before Dickens wrote his brief but moving Christmas tale, it was just another minor holiday on the English calendar, nowhere near as big as Easter. The change may have been afoot, with people in England starting to adopt the German tradition of a tannenbaum, a Christmas tree. There was also growing social awareness of, and public debate over, the plight of the poor in the Industrial Revolution, but Christmas was not yet a season of giving and kindness to the less-fortunate.
This story takes place at a low point in Charles Dickens’ (Dan Stevens) career, after his early success was followed by the publication of a few under-performing novels. Dickens is pressed for money, something he conceals from his well-meaning, neglected wife Kate (Morfydd Clark), and feels pressured to prove himself as an author as well, particularly to the irritating William Makepeace Thackeray (Miles Jupp). With the help of his loyal friend John Forster (Justin Edwards), Dickens hits on the idea of a Christmas-themed novel. But his publisher is not interested in a book about that little-celebrated holiday, so Dickens decides to publish the novel himself. That decision means he must not only write it but arrange the illustrations and printing as well as come up with the financing, all in time to release it before Christmas. To add to the pressure, Dickens ne’er-do-well father John (Jonathan Pryce) and mother (Ger Ryan) have turned up on his doorstep, out of cash and asking to stay with him, while the elder Dickens writes an article for a magazine for which he claims to have a contract.
This sets up not only a ticking-clock for Charles Dickens but all kinds of mayhem to beset the author as he struggles with his book and its characters. Dan Stevens gives us a hot-tempered, high-energy Dickens, who always seems on the edge of exploding as he battles writer’s block and rails against every interruption.
Colorful characters are a signature of Dickens’ novels, and one of this film’s delights is how it brings them to life wonderfully and weaves them into its tale. Dickens is taunted bitingly by Christopher Plummer’s Scrooge, glowered at by ghostly Marley (Donald Sumpter) and warmed by the jolly Spirit of Christmas Present, who looks just like his friend Forster. The author’s room fills with characters, and they follow and talk to the author as he wanders London streets seeking inspiration, or at least distraction from his writer’s block. At other more sober moments, Dickens relives the terrors of his childhood, remembering seeing his father sent to debtor’s prison and reliving the bullying he endured working as a child laborer in a boot-black factory.
Every writer who has struggled with writer’s block knows Dickens’ pain in that dilemma but the looming Christmas deadline makes it worse. If he does not publish before the holiday, the book won’t sell and his meager funds will he lost. While Dickens struggles to find his characters and his plot, his personal life intrudes, particularly his irritatingly irresponsible father. Jonathan Pryce is wonderful in the role of John Dickens, charming but cluelessly self-indulgent, begging money and them splurging on a new waistcoat, more a child than a parent to his son. Born a gentleman, the elder Dickens never was financially successful, and as his family fell into poverty, his son suffered from his poor money-handling. There is emotional potential in that but much of Dan Stevens’ performance is too one-note, sometimes bordering on hysterical, rather than a more subtle and deeper performance. However, the supporting cast tempers that by providing a little more nuance. Plummer’s Scrooge is particularly good in this respect, incorporating aspects of real people who Dickens encounters, such as a wealthy man who advocates debtors prisons (something Dickens family once experienced) or the miserly business partner of a man being buried at night in a dreary cemetery, who utters the famous “Bah, humbug.”
One might expect the socially-aware Dickens, who drew attention to the plight of the poor, and social ills like debtors prisons, and abusive orphanages, and wrote novels such as “Oliver Twist,” to identify with poor Bob Crachit. But the film draws parallels between the author and his villain Scrooge, played with verve by Christopher Plummer. Dickens had his darker side when it came to his own family (ever hear the phrase “the Dickens” meaning someone is an awful person? That refers to the author’s personal life) In this film, the focus is on Dickens’ dismissive attitude towards his wife and his impatience with his spend-thrift father, played wonderfully by Jonathan Pryce. The bits of Dickens’ personal life mostly serve as background for the developing novel, with a few references to some others of Dickens’ famous novels.
As a clever way to re-tell the perennial “A Christmas Carol,” THE MAN WHO INVENTED CHRISTMAS works pretty well. This polished period film is charming and entertaining for the most part, and delivers all the pretty Victorian Christmas imagery you could wish for. Bringing the story’s colorful characters to life to walk snowy London streets is a charming effect, as is illustrating how the author incorporated people he met into characters in the story. The characters trailing after Dickens, who they dismissively call “only the author,” provide a lot of fun, and the film sports delightful comic moments involving them. All the supporting cast is great, although Dan Stevens’ perpetually panicked Dickens wears on one after a time.
Where the film is less successful is in delivering what the title suggests, an insight into how Christmas came to be the holiday it is, and how it was regarded before Dickens’ novel transformed it. It was a minor holiday and people often didn’t even get the day off, certainly nothing like the biggest holiday of the year it is now, and it would have been nice to explore The holiday was how Christmas was regarded before and after his book was published, something only touched on superficially. The ways in which Dickens’s book changed Christmas are greater than people are often aware, the emphasis on “good will towards men” that we now associate with it, the idea of charity and giving, as well as the decorated tree, festive feast, family gathering, and even having the day off.
The film also falls short in painting a rounded portrait of Dickens himself, his complicated relationship with his father and wife, and his own character flaws. We get passing references and hints, about his difficult childhood and his neglect of his wife (something explored more fully in the 2013 film “Invisible Woman”) but little of that is fleshed out, explored or explained in this film.
As a holiday movie, THE MAN WHO INVENTED CHRISTMAS fits the bill, offering an inventive way to re-tell this beloved story, but it delivers less on the thing the title promises, insight on man behind the novel or on how is book “invented” the Christmas we know today.
RATING: 3 1/2 out of 5 stars
0 comments