<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>We Are Movie Geeks &#187; rotten tomatoes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/category/rotten-tomatoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; sitting at 90% on Rotten Tomatoes &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/the-dark-knight-sitting-at-90-on-rotten-tomatoes/</link>
		<comments>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/the-dark-knight-sitting-at-90-on-rotten-tomatoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotten tomatoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superheroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Bale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dark knight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=3925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/wp-content/thedarkknightdiscuss.jpg" alt="" width="558" height="274" /></p>
<p>Checking Rotten Tomatoes today I see that &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217;, which in my mind should be sitting at 100%, is <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_dark_knight/" target="_blank">only at 90%</a>. So lets talk about why.</p>
<p>First off there is a hack review from some guy(David Denby) with The New Yorker, who also didn&#8217;t seem to like <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/reviews/film/iron_man_favreau" target="_blank">IRONMAN</a>, You can read his <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2008/07/21/080721crci_cinema_denby" target="_blank">full review here</a>. Here is a snippit from his review:</p>
<p>&#8220;At times, the movie sounds like two excited mattresses making love in an echo chamber. In brief, Warner Bros. has continued to drain the poetry, fantasy, and comedy out of Tim Burton&rsquo;s original conception for &ldquo;Batmanâ€  (1989), completing the job of coarsening the material into hyper-violent summer action spectacle.&#8221;</p>
<p>The next bad review we get from David Edelstein with NY Mag(whats with the guys from NY not digging this movie?), who also didn&#8217;t seem to care for <a href="http://nymag.com/movies/reviews/46460/" target="_blank">IRONMAN</a>. You can read his full review of &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; here, but here is a snippit:</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>The Dark Knight</em> is noisy, jumbled, and sadistic.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then we have a review from <a href="http://www.starmagazine.com/the_dark_knight/reviews/movie/14019" target="_blank">Marshall Fine with Star Magazine</a>, but come on..did we expect anything less from this hack magazine?</p>
<p>There are 4 rotten reviews, and 37 fresh reviews..you decide who to believe. Kind of ridiculous.</p>
<div><a class="addthis_button" href="//addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250" addthis:url='http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/the-dark-knight-sitting-at-90-on-rotten-tomatoes/' addthis:title='&#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; sitting at 90% on Rotten Tomatoes &#8230; '><img src="//cache.addthis.com/cachefly/static/btn/v2/lg-share-en.gif" width="125" height="16" alt="Bookmark and Share" style="border:0"/></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/the-dark-knight-sitting-at-90-on-rotten-tomatoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 29/35 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 723/730 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-25 20:23:39 -->
