Posted by Travis Keune in General News, Review | 32 comments
Review: THE BOOK OF ELI
The Hughes Brothers, Albert and Allen, return from a nine year hiatus from feature filmmaking to give us their entry into the post-apocalyptic pool of stories. THE BOOK OF ELI is the Hughes Brothers’ follow up film to FROM HELL, which dates back to 2001. No, THE BOOK OF ELI has nothing to do with FROM HELL, but it does show a certain loosely interpreted fascination the filmmaking siblings have for timely tales of things not fully understood.
THE BOOK OF ELI was written by Gary Whitta, his first feature to be produced, drawing from and reveling in parallels to a very specific body of text. The story has Denzel Washington playing a mysterious wanderer named Eli, walking the country for many years on a path to the west. Carried with him is a book. Eli protects this book at all costs, meeting obstacles along his journey ranging from cannibalistic hijackers to motorcycle-riding bandits.
Despite how the film looks on the surface, THE BOOK OF ELI is not MAD MAX, nor is it THE ROAD of recent release. However, there are some basic thematic elements that it shares with those films. This is to be expected, given all three films deal directly with human life after a catastrophic event that wipes out most of the human race and life in general. There is also a familiar element of classic spaghetti westerns, with Washington serving as a new Man with No Name, except he has a name while dominating his numbered enemies.
The film opens quite slowly and poetically with Eli going about what is construed to be his daily routine. He walks, he hunts, he eats he reads and he sleeps. Eli lives a fairly simple and repetitive life, with the occasional violent encounter thrown in for good measure. This actually sets the pace and tone of THE BOOK OF ELI, which has unfortunately and misleadingly been marketed as an action-packed carnival of carnage. As I mentioned before, MAD MAX this is not. And, for those who have seen THE ROAD, it is not that either. In fact, THE BOOK OF ELI is a great mix of what makes both films enjoyable.
The beauty of THE BOOK OF ELI is in the story and lies in what is read between the lines. The underlying moral of the story will become evident rather quickly, but it’s the adaptation to a contemporary sense of moral ambiguity and a less black and white interpretation of good and evil that make it unique. Eli follows what he believes to be good and right, seeking a place to properly share the message he carries, while a local self-made leader named Carnegie seeks out the very book Eli carries to obtain power and control.
Carnegie, played by Gary Oldman, is a well-read and intelligent man; an older man like Eli, surrounded by the younger and ignorant generation of people born after “the flash” as it is referred in the movie. While Eli lives a life of solitude, Carnegie has surrounded himself by these younger degenerates, using his intellect to manipulate them to his will as he seeks out the sacred book. As always, Gary Oldman is a cinematic treat. Carnegie is portrayed as a less-neurotic, Southern version of Stansfield from LEON: THE PROFESSIONAL with the appeal of a morally corrupt televangelist, interested more in the sinful benefits of instilling faith amongst the sheep he intends to lead.
Mila Kunis plays the young tart Solara, enslaved by Carnegie for her naturally endowed characteristics, while Carnegie holds her blind mother hostage to bend her will in his favor. Kunis is not going to win any awards or garner critical acclaim, but she does the job as the wild card in the struggle between Eli and Carnegie. I have to admit; she is gradually beginning to shed the skin of Jackie from THE 70’s SHOW. Rounding out the cast are Ray Stevenson (PUNISHER: WAR ZONE) as Carnegie’s reliable right-hand man and Michael Gambon (HARRY POTTER) as George. Tom Waits also offers up a second wonderful character performance this year, this time as the town engineer employed by Carnegie within his little growing shanty town of misfits and hooligans.
Aside from the performances from Washington, Oldman and elements of the supporting cast, THE BOOK OF ELI is also rich in production value. Most significantly, the score demands attention. With original music composed by Atticus Ross, from the very opening sequence in the film it serves a powerfully present purpose in the film. Ross has worked with such artists as Bad Religion, Rancid and nine years with Nine Inch Nails, which has clearly had an influence on the score for THE BOOK OF ELI. The cinematography by Don Burgess (SPIDER-MAN, FORREST GUMP) is also worth mentioning as moody and descriptive, but doesn’t match up to the visual storytelling in THE ROAD from Javier Aguirreesarobe.
What stands out visually in THE BOOK OF ELI is the editing by Cindy Mollo. As I mentioned before, this is not an action film, but the scenes that required action and fight choreography are stellar in their effectiveness. Each of the handful of hand-to-hand combat sequences featured in the film are fluid and precise, cutting seamlessly to allow a continuous flow of action without relying on a lingering array of stationary camera shots. One scene in particular during a massive shoot-out features the best editing, giving the impression of one epic continuous shot and greatly enhances the adrenaline of the scene.
Overall, THE BOOK OF ELI is a rather slowly paced film compared to the widely marketed trailer. This is not a negative, but instead a surprising reason to see the film and appreciate it as more than just a big budget buffet of bad guys and explosions. There is an element of convenience and suspension of disbelief that is required, but I have to admit I didn’t recognize it fully until after the movie ended. Be sure to watch THE BOOK OF ELI closely, allow yourself to absorb the subtle intricacies and you’ll leave the theater with a heightened appreciation for the film in some very satisfying and surprising ways.



I must say I agree with this review, I too was expecting more action, but I wasn't disappointed at all
i too agree with this reveiw i loved the movie and looking forward to more from the hughes bros
This is the best review I've read so far. Thank you for doing the movie justice.
does anyone know what they meant by look at the hands, and said their not one of them??
They were checking for trembling of the hands, which would indicate the person as being one of the outland cannibals. They didn't touch on this element very significantly.
The purpose of looking at the hands was to check for the mark of the beast
Jenny I had the same question….and was Eli blind??
From what I understand, Eli was blind but had sight only for those that were troubled. I thought this was a great movie, probably one the best in a long time. I feel that Eli was either an angel or Jesus Christ. Did you pick up that it was 30 years after the devastation and it took 3 years for himto dictate totaling 33 years which was the age that Christ died.
No, I think he was most definately just a man. It felt like the book of Judges, from the old testiment. Or one of the old prophets that God came to and asked them to do something, usually to bring a message about repentence; and though they were flawed, God worked through them. God didn't send angels a whole lot to do works on earth, they're mostly messengers. He asks ordinary men and women, most of whom immediately say they aren't worthy, and work his grace through them. Eli was just an ordinary man, who was probably but not decidedly blind, that God asked to do his will and protected on his journey.
As for the 30 years wandering in the desert, I think they meant 40 years. That's how long the Israalites wandered in the desert after Moses got them out of Egpyt, before they were allowed into the promised land.
Where did they say it took three years to dictate?
People will find heavy-handed religious mumbo-jumbo wherever they want to see it. If I sit down long enough, I can show you how the chick with the cart was Mary Magdeline.
It's a movie. Stop believing in silly fairy tales and move on with your life.
i feel sorry that you actually think like that this was obviously a RELIGIOUS movie. Your just a guy who doesnt believe and therefore you think no one else should. and by writing these types of things you are just showing how sad and ignorant you are.
Dave, u're absolutely right
I agree wit Kate dats fuked up u asshole you shuld be ashamed!
If ppl believe in something don't ruin it for them or tell them its not true. You never do that, that it rude and if i ask anyone else you would probably get shot for saying stupid crap like that Dave and Tehort. Thats like telling a little kid that Santa isn't real or that the tooth fairy isn't real. Its stupid and heart breaking, But I personally loved the movie it made me really think about life itself in general! I enjoyed it very much and i believe he was portraid as an angel sent to protect but still with human qualities!
Well written post, looks brilliant on my iPhone as well.
No, eli is not blind.. i went back and watched it again.. pretty much for that reason.. seeing it the 2nd time really cleared it up.. the whole movie you can tell he isnt.. some examples i got are: 1. he sees the car on the side of the road at the beginning and goes over to it to check for something (the radio i assume) 2. when he shoots the cat, he walks over to it, picks it up, looks it up and down and also glances at his arrow to make sure its ok.. 3. after falling asleep with the ipod in he looks at it when he wakes up and sees that the battery is dead.. 4. Also when hes leaving after spending the night in the town, he is going to pick up his radio that was charging, when he gets there the guy has it plugged up still and Eli points to the 2 cables, and tells the store man to take them off that he has to go now 5. finally, as he approaches the edge of that overpass, he stops and hides behind the rock, and several times peeks over it to see the hijackers killing those 2 people, then remembers the guy in the bar when he comes up to him for shooing the cat..
These are just some examples.. like i said, going back to watch it cleared it up 100%
I think the point of the braille was just so that no one else could read it..
hope that helps..
I believe he was blind, that is why people say when you lose one sense you gain greater ability in the other sense. I believe his sense of hearing was so great. I think all the things you named out he was able to sense them. Just like on karate movies when they fight blind folded. They have trained as if they are blind so the sense of hearing & expectations are greater. Clearly at the end when you see the bible is in braile it was clear to me that he was blind.
I also went back and watched it again and think he was blind. There were some things it seemed we wasn't for but but he tripped over some things in the beginning. Your other senses are definitely greater when you lose one so that could have been the case. I also knew someone who was legally blind and could barely see but up could make out objects and things just looked blurry to her. I feel like that may have been the case.
there are 4 things in the movie which would lead people to believe he was blind. (1) He bumped into something in the house at the beginning, (2) he kicked the step and touched the front door at the old folks house as if he was checking if they were there (oh he also said he didn't see the "NO TRESSPASSING" sign). (3) He said he walks through faith not by sight, and finally the Bible was in braille. But there are dozens of things in the movie which argue he can see, most notibly, the fact that he looks at everything throughout the movie. I've watched it twice and can tell you without question, if Denzel was trying to play a blind man he did a lousy job.
Being blind is not always 100% total absense of light…..he could of had the ability to see motion and object very close. This was I assumed and the reasoning for him learning to read brail at one time in his life. As for his heightened sense it's plausible. Me being a soldier I noticed many times my sense of smell and hearing increasing over just a month being away from the city.
The movie was much better than I thought it would be and not as violent as I thought by reading other reviews and from the trailers on tv. I am not sure if I agree with kiel about eli being blind. I remember all of his examples and he makes a great case but each one could be explained a little differently. The most likely way Eli would have come to be able to read brail (what the book was written in) would be that he was blind. Either that or divine intervention or he was a teacher of brail at a very young age. Not to mention the close up of his eyes towards the end of the movie showed they were very cloudy. It seemed more like he was being led. I believe he also said he walked by faith not by sight. I guess the film was made to let you go either way with that. Great movie though.
Eli isn't blind. Go get your handgun, go out in the middle of no where. Setup random targets about 20 yards from you. Close your eyes and start firing at the targets. Now get a paintball gun, and several friends armed with paintball guns. Have them stand at random positions about 20 yards from you and then start firing at you while you close your eyes and try to shoot them back. Still think Eli is blind? You're crazy if you do. You need eyesight to shoot with accuracy, period! Eli may have had trouble with his vision. Seeing how there aren't many doctors to fill out an prescription for glasses. Thus learning brail shortly after the bombs fell would have been a must if he found a brail copy of the bible. But doing stuff like searching cars, locking a girl in a cave, shooting people with bows and arrows…dude, get real
Eli was blind, although I don't think completely. Many were said to have gone blind during the catastrophe which makes it reasonable to believe this happened to him also. Most likely he could see shadows but that's about it. The reason he could shoot everyone without actually "seeing" them is the same reason he was so good with various weapons and had survived as long as he had on his journey though "blind". Because of his Faith. Call it the hand of God or whatever, but he was being watched over in his travels. I am not one of religious faith but can appreciate what was being presented and accept it as such as long as the movie stays true to its own mythology. This is all wrapped up in the end by giving a new meaning to "blind faith". This holds true today in our society, those with such powerful faith or conviction can accomplish the most ambitious tasks not because of an invisible helping hand but due to the determination that true faith can grant.
did anyone ever think that perhaps he was blind and God restored his sight when he set him on his path, keeping a watchful eye over him. maybe thats why the directors stressed that phrase when Eli was dictating the Bible at the end "God said let there be light, and there was light". I don't know what the directors were doing but I can say that Denzel clearly looked at everything throughout theentire movie. I don't think blind people do alot of looking at anything.
I really don't think Eli was blind. People who say that because the book was in Braille shows that he was blind are being a bit blind themselves. You don't have to be blind to read Braille. Also, I don't care how good your hearing or sense of smell is, there's just no way you could fight like that with a blade at close range that fast with many attackers at once. You can't search for things in the movie that suggest he IS blind, you need to search for things in the movie that would be possible only if he was not blind.
He Is Blind. Search a little harder on the internet. Watch the movie with the directors commentary.
Some People who are legally Blind can still see objects. In the beginning of the movie when he fights under the bridge notice how he drags them into the dark instead of fighting in the light. Also when he shoots the cat he didn't fire until he heard the cat hiss. Along with the gunfight in town every one he shot had fired at him first. If his sense of hearing is so great he could point and shoot like an instinct shooter,
He is blind It would not matter if he wasn't In my opinion. It wouldn't take away from the fact that this was an Entertaining movie. It just makes Eli that much more bad ass. Also DO NOT think you know what a blind person can or cant do If you haven't been blind your self. Also Its a Movie so Why the hell Argue over it Agree to Disagree correct? Dave and Tehort …( possibly the same person backing his first ridiculous comment up so he can feel good about him self.) Just jealous that you cant enjoy or respect any thing but your own Egos.
[...] post: Movie Review: Favourite Movie| Posted in Movie Tags: action, favourite [...]
Look at the end of the movie when they do a closeup of Eli's face you see his eyes are glazed over. Giving the impression that he is blind or partially blind
Paintball guns are sometimes painfull when you are hit by a paintball*`.
my paintball gun is made in germany and it is very good-~;
Eli was definately blind, I rewatched this movie many times and picked up on every subtle nuance that explains he was absolutely blind. When he approaches the car in the beginning he almost walks by, but stops, backs up a bit and walks over to it, hitting the side of the car with his bag to get a reference of where it was. The reason why he could tell the car was there was the corpse inside which would have given off a decomposing odor to him. If you look at when his iPod dies, he clicks some of the buttons and rotates the volume circle around, nothing happens and thats how he realizes the battery is dead.
During the main gun battle in the street, everytime he shoots its a reaction to another shot being fired at him (or when they’re running, i.e. loud footsteps), therefore he is sensing the direction of his enemies’ shots and then firing in a back azimuth to his intended target. He wasn’t able to tell Solara was dressed provocatively until she told him he should sit down and realized she was sent there to have sex with him. His sense of smell is obviously heightened due to him sensing the blind woman’s shampoo and calling it perfume because it was such a strong odor to him. When he shoots the bird he tells Solara to be quiet because he’s listening to the sound of the bird’s wings fluttering. Of course the MOST obvious fact is that the bible is brail…
This movie is about faith, bottom line it asks you to suspend logic and just believe that Eli is able to accomplish everything a normal man can with vision through his faith. “I once was blind but now I see.” I’m not even religious but I can find this obvious message within the movie… stop trying to justify why he can’t be blind because overall if you really look at each scene, nearly everything you think he’s doing through sight can be explained (if not very realistically) through other senses.
He is most definitely blind, i’ve seen the movie a few times. Blind people do tend to move there eyes, in search of anything. Just because they cannot see, does not mean he can’t move his eyes around . His sense of smell and hearing as well as his touch were acute. He felt the sun on his face at numeral occasion, used his sense of smell when the hijackers came and his hearing was a huge part of his abilities.
He had, obviously unrealistic characteristics, it’s a movie. But it also made the movie.
Best movie I had seen in a long time.