Comments on: Disney Sinks CAPTAIN NEMO

By: hammond parts

hammond parts — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:05:04 +0000

I dunno. I'd rather someone hire a good director (or, rather, a director of good films) to make a Nemo movie, or even a remake. Not to trash McG (as the material may have been the biggest issue), but his track record so far(Charlie's Angels, Terminator Salvation) has left little to be desired.

By: Sad Sack

Sad Sack — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 06:34:27 +0000

Disney probably didn’t want viewers to confuse it with FINDING Nemo ;-)

By: NoMasNemo

NoMasNemo — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:57:40 +0000

This was a really stupid Decision. "Nemo" Had great potential of revitalizing a very cool classic property, with the possibility of a string new films. Theme park tie-ins, licensing, etc would have been big money makers. "Pirates" is a good property and all, but the "pirate" craze has passed. If Depp was smart, he hit them for $50 million or better since this is truly a case of Disney cashing in in on his name. They (Disney) should've just plugged Depp or some other big name (Will Smith) into 20K and started a new franchise. This clearly a Rich Ross ego move, and sadly typical of Disney. "I won't dignify another person's good idea", could probably have been heard from Rich Ross' bedroom when took the scepter. It all about P*ssing on the bush anymore. Just one industry person's opinion.