<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 Animated Features Line Up for 2009 Oscar® Race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:30:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adeline Warmath</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-22552</link>
		<dc:creator>Adeline Warmath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-22552</guid>
		<description>Sag mal wie heisst den dieses Template auf dieser Seite? Ich hab das schon mal wo bestaunt und w</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sag mal wie heisst den dieses Template auf dieser Seite? Ich hab das schon mal wo bestaunt und w</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk13</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20840</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20840</guid>
		<description>A Bug&#039;s Life, definitely.  Better animation than Antz, but everything else Antz does is far superior. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Bug&#039;s Life, definitely.  Better animation than Antz, but everything else Antz does is far superior. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20839</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20839</guid>
		<description>I completely agree Kirk. Pixar was able to pull the strings of my heart with &quot;Up&quot; unlike any of their other movies. I won&#039;t even lie, forget misty-eyed, I straight up cried in the opening sequence!  
 
Although I think trying to figure out Pixar&#039;s weakest film could make for a good article here at WAMG. I would say A Bugs Life or Cars, but I still love both of them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree Kirk. Pixar was able to pull the strings of my heart with &quot;Up&quot; unlike any of their other movies. I won&#039;t even lie, forget misty-eyed, I straight up cried in the opening sequence!  </p>
<p>Although I think trying to figure out Pixar&#039;s weakest film could make for a good article here at WAMG. I would say A Bugs Life or Cars, but I still love both of them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk13</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20837</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20837</guid>
		<description>As much as I love Miyazaki, PONYO was, by far, his weakest film in a long time.  UP was incredible.  It was the first, animated movie in a long, LONG, time that got me misty-eyed, and that was in the first 15 minutes.  There is no question UP is going to walk away with that statue. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I love Miyazaki, PONYO was, by far, his weakest film in a long time.  UP was incredible.  It was the first, animated movie in a long, LONG, time that got me misty-eyed, and that was in the first 15 minutes.  There is no question UP is going to walk away with that statue. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyrone</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20833</link>
		<dc:creator>tyrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20833</guid>
		<description>Nothing looked better than &quot;9&quot;, but it left you thinking is this it. &#039;Up&quot; is by far the weakest PIXAR film. Ice Age, Monsters and Cloudy were forced. It is Ponyo&quot;s time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing looked better than &quot;9&quot;, but it left you thinking is this it. &#039;Up&quot; is by far the weakest PIXAR film. Ice Age, Monsters and Cloudy were forced. It is Ponyo&quot;s time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: super_aj</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20828</link>
		<dc:creator>super_aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20828</guid>
		<description>Thats a damn good point. I&#039;m sure theres some rule saying that a certain percentage of the film needs to be animated in which case Squeakquel might fall into that catagory, but then again, Avatar should be on the list too. Good question sir, good question. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a damn good point. I&#039;m sure theres some rule saying that a certain percentage of the film needs to be animated in which case Squeakquel might fall into that catagory, but then again, Avatar should be on the list too. Good question sir, good question. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk13</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20826</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20826</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one curious how THE SQUEAKQUEL is even eligible for this?  If that&#039;s eligible, wouldn&#039;t something like AVATAR or TRANSFORMERS be up for it, as well?  Maybe they would have been they just weren&#039;t submitted for consideration.  That&#039;s the only thing I can come up with.  Thoughts? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one curious how THE SQUEAKQUEL is even eligible for this?  If that&#039;s eligible, wouldn&#039;t something like AVATAR or TRANSFORMERS be up for it, as well?  Maybe they would have been they just weren&#039;t submitted for consideration.  That&#039;s the only thing I can come up with.  Thoughts? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk13</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20827</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20827</guid>
		<description>No doubt about it, UP should win this hands down. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about it, UP should win this hands down. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/11/20-animated-features-line-up-for-2009-oscar%c2%ae-race/comment-page-1/#comment-20822</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=39813#comment-20822</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;m yet to see &quot;Fantastic Mr. Fox&quot; and I think it will be great, if &quot;Up&quot; doesn&#039;t win I&#039;ll call Shannanigans. But who honestly thinks it won&#039;t win? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#039;m yet to see &quot;Fantastic Mr. Fox&quot; and I think it will be great, if &quot;Up&quot; doesn&#039;t win I&#039;ll call Shannanigans. But who honestly thinks it won&#039;t win? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 29/43 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 794/803 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-25 15:58:13 -->
