Sep 1, 2009

Posted by in General News, In the Works, Up and Coming | 11 comments

‘Wizard of Oz’ Update

Billie-Burke-and-Judy-Gar-001  

From the horse’s mouth comes new word on ‘The Wizard of Oz’ remake. Todd McFarlane spoke exclusively to Empire  with  an explanation  on his stroll down the Yellow Brick Road:

McFarlane on the start date being early next year: We’re in Hollywood, so you have to predicate all statements of that sort with “our intent would be…” I’m sure the higher-ups at Warner Bros. would like to have it on their schedule, and they’re probably moving in that direction. But we’ve seen in our lifetime thousands of cases where things don’t go according to plan, right?

On the state of the script: They’re on their second iteration right now, trying to get it into a zone that makes sense. Josh Olsen wrote a draft that didn’t quite strike Warners fancy. Everyone was a little lukewarm. They wanted it more sexy! So they were going to do a rewrite and get some fresh eyes on it.

On the story being based around Dorothy’s granddaughter: The first draft had those elements. Will they remain? Can’t be sure.

On filming in Britain: That’s putting the cart before the horse. That depends on what kind of budget comes in, where the confidence level is for the studio execs, where they’ll have the most success stretching their dollars…

On Dakota Fanning as Dorothy: I haven’t heard that. If we just do a sugary sweet Dorothy that everybody has seen over and over for 50 years, as far as I’m concerned, that’s too obvious. I’m happy to go with whoever will get the most people in the seats, but sometimes that can change from month to month.

On going “dark”: I think my “Twisted” version is a little scary for Warners to embrace. I essentially pitched Lord of the Rings. It was big, it was bold and it wasn’t a very pretty place. It was badass! There’s no Baum in it at all. When they bought it from me, my thing was, turn off the MGM mindset. It’s a public domain property, let’s go invent some cool new ideas, which basically will surprise people. What’s going to get a new generation to go look at Oz is if you reinvent it on some level. Not every single level, but some of them have to be new. Shut down your preconceived notions. For me, you should be looking at an isolated movie, that, oh, by the way, happens to be Oz. To get the new audience you’re going to have to put some edges on this thing. My version would rock! But they’re all like, “We’re spending $100m here, we can’t go totally nuts, Todd!” So I’ve told them that the movie I like is the one they’re willing to make!

It still a bloody awful idea.

Bookmark and Share







  1. This is insane. Don't remake WoO — make WICKED into a movie instead!

  2. This is insane. Don't remake WoO — make WICKED into a movie instead!

  3. I hope a house falls out of the sky and lands on Todd.

  4. This is a mistake when will those idiots in Hollywood learn you can't remake a classic film like the Wizard of Oz!

  5. Richard Donner says:

    I don't think it is a remake at all. Just some one else's vision of Baum's creation.

    • Precisely, Mr. Donner. There are far worse damnable offenses than redoing a story that didn't even start out as a motion picture to begin with. I'm sure 90% of the people bitching about McFarlane redoing the WIZARD OF OZ story don't even realize the 1939 film wasn't even the first time WIZARD OF OZ was adapted for the silver screen. There are soooooo many versions of the WIZARD OF OZ story out there on film. McFarlane putting his "dark" spin on it is a long way from sacrilege.

  6. Oh, and if you're truly worried about this film, take heart in knowing that McFarlane takes forever, FOREVER in getting his projects off the ground. He's been talking about a Spawn sequel for more than a decade now.

  7. Flush another $150million down the toilet that could be use to make two or three NEW movies…. when are studios going to learn we DONT want our childhoods and classic films raped to death.

  8. Library Lass says:

    As much as Oz needs a serious treatment (really, go back and read the books, there is some badass stuff), Todd is the wrong person to be doing it.

  9. "The Wizard of Oz" was the first of a series of fourteen amazing books by L. Frank Baum. I would love to see the series get a Lord of the Rings or Harry Potter-style epic treatment. There's no need for someone to invent a "dark" treatment of the material. If they return to the original books they will find all the dark they could want. The trouble will be finding a Dorothy young enough that she can be in all fourteen movies and still seem the same age. If they hire a star the movies will be too expensive (bloated salaries) by the third film in the series. The MGM 1939 film will always be the classic it is; a new version won't ruin it.

  10. Just where perhaps you have discovered the supply for this kind of post? Amazing reading through I’ve subscribed for your site feed.

Leave a Reply