Jul 26, 2009

Posted by Travis Keune in Review, Shorts | 12 comments

Review: CRIME SWEEPERS

crimesweepers

” — ” (That’s a blank stare and an empty thought with my jaw hanging open.) I’m all about being supportive of indie filmmakers and the films they want to make. With that said, it doesn’t mean I have to like the film. I’m glad Lance Mora got to make CRIME SWEEPERS, his 30-minute comedy short and I’m glad it has garnered him some festival booty. However, and I simply have to be perfectly honest, I really found little to enjoy in this film.

To be fair, let me explain… It was the final day of the CineVegas Film Festival 2009 and while hanging out in the food court of the Palms Casino before heading back to my hotel, a man stops me and hands me a burned DVD in a paper slip. The DVD has “CRIME SWEEPERS” written on it and the man introduces himself to me as Lance Mora and told me this was his film from “the other festival,” meaning the Las Vegas International Film Festival. He asked if I would like to check out his movie and, as I always respond to these encounters, I said “sure.”

Fast forward to now. Yeah, it took me a while to finally sit down with CRIME SWEEPERS, but I did follow through with my promise. Before I go any further, let me briefly explain the film and then I’ll go into more detail. CRIME SWEEPERS is a crime caper comedy that features characters that are brooms and mops… Yep.

The trend of vulgar, profane, risque, coarse and controversial comedy is growing and the success of films like BORAT and WAITING have made this trend more popular. I’m not going to sit here and knock on this genre, simply because there is a lot of it that works and is actually funny. The trick however, is that it can be tough to pull off. There are low-budget indie filmmakers that focus on this style of humor and are relatively successful, but CRIME SWEEPERS still needs some work.

CRIME SWEEPERS relies almost solely on profanity combined with cliched genre references and crude bathroom humor, including a vomiting broom cop and a perverted OB/GYN delivering a woman’s baby, uh… I mean, little broom. Which actually brings me to another point. I would have liked to see Mora either stick with the whole mop and broom gag the entire film, or else toss it out completely and just use real people characters. The Hot Lab Girl, played by Tonya Mora, and the OB/GYN are real person characters whereas the others are all brooms or mops.

Adding to the projectile vomiting at a crime scene is projectile bleeding during the birthing scene, followed by projectile peeing on the doctor by the, uh, little broom. One of the detective characters is called Tony Danza, but for what reason eludes me. Perhaps the most creative part of CRIME SWEEPERS is the bad guy, a character named Christopher Mopin. This character is intended to be like Christopher Walken, making an attempt to mimic both his gestures and his voice. Later in the story, Christopher Mopin busts Dennis Mopper (get it?) out of prison.

Half way through the film, the depravity takes the express lane into unpleasant territory. Then again, CRIME SWEEPERS was made in and the story is set in Las Vegas, so that explains a lot. Unfortunately, this didn’t stay in vegas. Look, I really don’t want end this on a negative note. The film, despite it’s many flaws, had potential as a gimmick-driven short sort of like the now defunct thumb-themed bits like THUMB WARS. There’ll be some out there that enjoy the film, I am certain of that… it just didn’t do anything for me.

Best Nevada Film – Las Vegas International Film Festival 2009
Best Comedy Short – Action on Film International Film Festival 2008

Bookmark and Share







  1. Del Weston says:

    I am never surprised any more when I read a negative review of a film or video. I believe now that every review written should come with a link to the work created by the reviewer and not just of the piece reviewed. It is easy to comment, dissect, ridicule and destroy a film in a short critique, it is not so easy to make the film that is being critiqued. That being said, the internet has become a haven for nameless, faceless critics who are brave behind the keyboard but when it comes to showing something they have created; there simply isn't much to show.
    Crime Sweepers is a funny film. I know because I watched people pay to see it and then sit in their chairs and laugh at its absurd take on spoof and its innovative use the camera and its characters. Is the film right for everyone? Absolutely not. Will everyone get it? Absolutely not but does that diminish the value of the film? Absolutely not.
    While every critic has the right to his or her opinion it would be nice if they had both the ability and guts to produce work equal to or better than the work they were reviewing.

  2. Wow, Del. You really have a strong opinion about this. It's unfortunate, however, that you choose to do the very same to "film critics" as you accuse me of doing to filmmakers. If you had actually bothered to read my many other reviews, you would have discovered that I rarely write purely negative reviews, as you have suggested. In fact, not even this review of crime sweepers is entirely negative. It's called an opinion and that's all it is. I'm amazed at how an unknown person who "saw people pay to see" a film considers themselves an authority on the subject. I've paid to see a lot of films, many of which I laughed at, but it didn't inherently make them "good" films. By the way, I received a message directly from Lance Mora, the director of Crime Sweepers, and wjile I'm sure he would have liked to see a more positive review, he was appreciative of my taking the time to give my opinion. I believe I was fair in my review and while I did not appreciate the intended humor, I am sure others have and will. With that said, and I assume you're a filmmaker given your stated challenge to have the "ability and guts" to make a film, I recommend not offering your film up for criticism if you can't handle the simple fact of life that not everyone in going to like it. I commend Mr. Mora and support his filmmaking pursuit as I did in the review, however I do not commend Del Weston in his inappropriate personal attacks on a person he doesn't even know. Have a nice day!

  3. <object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/q_gkjgMfEGI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0×5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/q_gkjgMfEGI&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0×5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object>

  4. If you want to watch the first five minutes of Crime Sweepers. Here is the you tube link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_gkjgMfEGI You can also watch all of Crime Sweepers at IndieFlix.com

    follow this link: http://www.indieflix.com/Films/CRIMESWEEPERS

  5. OttoMoBiehl says:

    Spot on review. I've seen Crime Sweepers many times now as Lance Mora is a friend of mine and we've worked on other projects together. I enjoy Crime Sweepers because I do know Lance and the other guys who made it and appreciate the effort that went into it, and for the fact that I know how hard it is to get yourself, friends and resources together to make a flick. Now saying all that I'm not going to say the film didn't have it's flaws.

    I would have liked the film to have some more subtle moments with the humor and the gross-out stuff. For example: In Monty Pythons Holy Grail the fight between Arthur and the Black Knight is bloody but also funny. It's not funny because of all the blood and such but for the ridiculousness of the situation.

    Anyway, the flick is for the most part fun and shows what you can do with a low budget. My hat goes off to Lance and his friends for being able to pull this off.

  6. Del Weston says:

    Travis, you might try reading my comments again. I never mention your name once, nor do I make any attacks on anyone. My statements deal directly with critics and reviews. I don't know who you are nor do I know your work. Where do you see a personal attack in anything I wrote? If you consider yourself a nameless, faceless critic with no work of his own to show or to be critiqued; then I guess you could find a way to be offended but my comments were not pointed towards you, only towards seeing what work exists by people who call themselves critics. Please don't mis-quote me or take my words out of context. If I used your name or referenced you that would be to your point; but the fact of the matter is I didn't so let's keep the jargon about personal attacks out of the conversation. Thank you.

  7. Oh, alright. I guess I just assumed you were referring to the review of Crime Sweepers on which you posted the comment. In which case, if your intention was to comment on that review you are commenting on a review that I wrote, therefore it was directed towards me, regardless of whether you know me or not. If in deed the comment was not in any way directed towards the review on which it was posted, then I beg your pardon for misreading, but it would raise the question of why you would post such a comment on a review that has no connection with the points you had attempted to make? It sounds a bit like you want to have your cake and eat it too, in which I reply… if you can't stand the heat, don't play with matches!

  8. Crime Sweepers wins SPECIAL JURY PRIZE at the 2009 Nevada Film Festival.

  9. CRIME SWEEPERS REVENGE OF THE BROOM WITCH
    [youtube sQv5mpHvNdQ >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQv5mpHvNdQ youtube]

  10. CRIME SWEEPERS

    [youtube D8r51LP4ziU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8r51LP4ziU youtube]

Leave a Reply