<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WAMG Gets Fan&#8217;s Reactions to &#8216;Star Trek&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/05/wamg-gets-fans-reactions-to-star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/05/wamg-gets-fans-reactions-to-star-trek/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/05/wamg-gets-fans-reactions-to-star-trek/comment-page-1/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=25231#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>Just watched your review. Found it funny that your friends complained about the cam shots in the movie when your review looks like you were trying to film during hurricane force winds (maybe you should get a tripod...hahaha). Anyways, the movie was fine as a stand alone &quot;lets film alternative timeline prequels/sequels&quot; but I hate when continuity is messed with. Altough it would be interesting for franchises like Star Trek, Star Wars and others to explore aternative timelines on the big screen for us die hard fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watched your review. Found it funny that your friends complained about the cam shots in the movie when your review looks like you were trying to film during hurricane force winds (maybe you should get a tripod&#8230;hahaha). Anyways, the movie was fine as a stand alone &#8220;lets film alternative timeline prequels/sequels&#8221; but I hate when continuity is messed with. Altough it would be interesting for franchises like Star Trek, Star Wars and others to explore aternative timelines on the big screen for us die hard fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/05/wamg-gets-fans-reactions-to-star-trek/comment-page-1/#comment-13645</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=25231#comment-13645</guid>
		<description>You are welcome TOON. Glad we could provide you and your grandmother with this wonderful experience together. Hope to see you at future screenings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome TOON. Glad we could provide you and your grandmother with this wonderful experience together. Hope to see you at future screenings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOON</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/05/wamg-gets-fans-reactions-to-star-trek/comment-page-1/#comment-13639</link>
		<dc:creator>TOON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=25231#comment-13639</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for letting us see &quot;Star Trek&quot; again last night, my Grandmother and I really appreciated it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for letting us see &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; again last night, my Grandmother and I really appreciated it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 27/33 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 689/689 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-25 12:26:32 -->
