<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is &#8216;Moon&#8217; not getting a nice, big, wide release?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:25:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super - Dwight Schrute and Juno in spandex - Page 2 - Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-107982</link>
		<dc:creator>Super - Dwight Schrute and Juno in spandex - Page 2 - Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-107982</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by Vorph   Well, they certainly weren&#039;t kidding when they called this a &quot;limited&quot; release... 11 screens nationwide, all in NY, DC, LA, and Boston.     Thats really bad news. If I could see it here I&#039;d be at the theater right now, it&#039;s the only show out right now I want to see. Moon got the same treatment but much better reviews and it was a pain in the butt to see until they realized people actually liked it and released it on video. Why is &#8216;Moon&#8217; not getting a nice, big, wide release? &#124; We Are Movie Geeks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by Vorph   Well, they certainly weren&#039;t kidding when they called this a &quot;limited&quot; release&#8230; 11 screens nationwide, all in NY, DC, LA, and Boston.     Thats really bad news. If I could see it here I&#039;d be at the theater right now, it&#039;s the only show out right now I want to see. Moon got the same treatment but much better reviews and it was a pain in the butt to see until they realized people actually liked it and released it on video. Why is &#8216;Moon&#8217; not getting a nice, big, wide release? | We Are Movie Geeks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pro Bus</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-18672</link>
		<dc:creator>Pro Bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-18672</guid>
		<description>going to see  Moon to-night  at the local theater here in keswick  ontario, two showings at 9:20 fri/sat and that it ,gone forever ! there has to be a story here! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>going to see  Moon to-night  at the local theater here in keswick  ontario, two showings at 9:20 fri/sat and that it ,gone forever ! there has to be a story here! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-18122</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 15:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-18122</guid>
		<description>So sad that it&#039;s playing in only one theater in Toronto, ON -- that, too, only one show, four days a week. Great movie going to waste ... What a shame! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sad that it&#039;s playing in only one theater in Toronto, ON &#8212; that, too, only one show, four days a week. Great movie going to waste &#8230; What a shame! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quintushalls</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-14856</link>
		<dc:creator>Quintushalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-14856</guid>
		<description>I just saw the film at the Landmark cinema in Waltham, MA in a packed theater and it was excellent! Best science fiction film of the decade! From the trailer, it gives off a &#039;brain-fuck&#039; vibe, but it isn&#039;t at all. Everything is clearly explained and the movie has great flow where every scene stands out on its own. It made ~$231,000 the last week in CA &amp; NY and cost $5 million. I guess they will do a wider release later on or expect to make the money back on DVD. If this film doesn&#039;t get nominated for the Academy Awards, I would be very surprised.  
 
Can we start a campaign to contact Sony Pictures Classics to get them to make this wider? Sony_Classics@spe.sony.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw the film at the Landmark cinema in Waltham, MA in a packed theater and it was excellent! Best science fiction film of the decade! From the trailer, it gives off a &#039;brain-fuck&#039; vibe, but it isn&#039;t at all. Everything is clearly explained and the movie has great flow where every scene stands out on its own. It made ~$231,000 the last week in CA &amp; NY and cost $5 million. I guess they will do a wider release later on or expect to make the money back on DVD. If this film doesn&#039;t get nominated for the Academy Awards, I would be very surprised.  </p>
<p>Can we start a campaign to contact Sony Pictures Classics to get them to make this wider? <a href="mailto:Sony_Classics@spe.sony.com">Sony_Classics@spe.sony.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gecko</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-14697</link>
		<dc:creator>gecko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-14697</guid>
		<description>142 theaters? It&#039;s only playing at three theaters here in New York City and four in LA as far as I can see. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>142 theaters? It&#039;s only playing at three theaters here in New York City and four in LA as far as I can see. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-13346</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-13346</guid>
		<description>the fact is, this is a very marketable film! If they cut a really good trailer for the public I think people would flock to it..especially with all the great reviews it has gotten everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact is, this is a very marketable film! If they cut a really good trailer for the public I think people would flock to it..especially with all the great reviews it has gotten everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2009/04/why-is-moon-not-getting-a-nice-big-wide-release/comment-page-1/#comment-13342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=24103#comment-13342</guid>
		<description>It really has no bearing on how good a film is.  Thousands of movie-lovers can rave about &#039;Requiem for a Dream.&#039;  That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s going to find a wide release, because the studio realizes how divisive the film is.  Divisive, at best!  

What I will say to Sony is that &#039;Moon&#039; is not only a near flawless film, it is a film that can easily appeal to a mass audience.  My way of deciding if the casual moviegoer would enjoy a film is by thinking if my mother (a casual moviegoer) would enjoy it.  While she might not go out to watch &#039;Moon&#039; (sci-fi isn&#039;t her cup of tea) I think she would highly enjoy it, and, as such, I am going to promote the hell out of the film so that as many people as I can get will seek out the film.  It deserves it.  

Not only does it deserve it, but Sony could easily market it to a broader audience and rake in some serious dough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really has no bearing on how good a film is.  Thousands of movie-lovers can rave about &#8216;Requiem for a Dream.&#8217;  That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s going to find a wide release, because the studio realizes how divisive the film is.  Divisive, at best!  </p>
<p>What I will say to Sony is that &#8216;Moon&#8217; is not only a near flawless film, it is a film that can easily appeal to a mass audience.  My way of deciding if the casual moviegoer would enjoy a film is by thinking if my mother (a casual moviegoer) would enjoy it.  While she might not go out to watch &#8216;Moon&#8217; (sci-fi isn&#8217;t her cup of tea) I think she would highly enjoy it, and, as such, I am going to promote the hell out of the film so that as many people as I can get will seek out the film.  It deserves it.  </p>
<p>Not only does it deserve it, but Sony could easily market it to a broader audience and rake in some serious dough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 27/37 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 757/757 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-25 10:27:05 -->
