<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: &#8216;The Day the Earth Stood Still&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyrone</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still/comment-page-1/#comment-9787</link>
		<dc:creator>tyrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=10588#comment-9787</guid>
		<description>I was thinking it was painfully slow and that the best performace was from Jaden Smith. I thought that a lot of these rolls could have been thrown away. 4 stars for Mr. smith, 2 stars for the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking it was painfully slow and that the best performace was from Jaden Smith. I thought that a lot of these rolls could have been thrown away. 4 stars for Mr. smith, 2 stars for the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/review-the-day-the-earth-stood-still/comment-page-1/#comment-9780</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=10588#comment-9780</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know. I saw an advanced screening of it last night and I didn&#039;t think it was that terrible. I wouldn&#039;t highly rate it, but I don&#039;t think it was as much of an atrocity as you guys made it out to be. It doesn&#039;t compare to the original and whenever you remake something that was such a classic, it is always going to be held to a much higher standard. I think this was a decent movie with a decent story and decent acting. But decent doesn&#039;t mean good, it just means completely run of the mill. I would give it a 3 out of 5 if it was up to me, 2.5 out of 5 if I wanted to be mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know. I saw an advanced screening of it last night and I didn&#8217;t think it was that terrible. I wouldn&#8217;t highly rate it, but I don&#8217;t think it was as much of an atrocity as you guys made it out to be. It doesn&#8217;t compare to the original and whenever you remake something that was such a classic, it is always going to be held to a much higher standard. I think this was a decent movie with a decent story and decent acting. But decent doesn&#8217;t mean good, it just means completely run of the mill. I would give it a 3 out of 5 if it was up to me, 2.5 out of 5 if I wanted to be mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 27/32 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 672/672 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-25 02:30:37 -->
