<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Hancock 2&#8242; Is Happening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/hancock-2-is-happening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/hancock-2-is-happening/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: astroblack</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/hancock-2-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-9568</link>
		<dc:creator>astroblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=10019#comment-9568</guid>
		<description>^ What Stacy said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ What Stacy said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/hancock-2-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-9562</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=10019#comment-9562</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the first half of the movie.  Once the movie delved into the Will Smith/Charlize Theron character relationship, the movie went straight downhill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the first half of the movie.  Once the movie delved into the Will Smith/Charlize Theron character relationship, the movie went straight downhill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/hancock-2-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-9558</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=10019#comment-9558</guid>
		<description>I liked it...I thought it was entertaining.  Sometimes you want mindless fluff to entertain you and shit to blow up. 

But I do think ppl get carried away with sequels these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked it&#8230;I thought it was entertaining.  Sometimes you want mindless fluff to entertain you and shit to blow up. </p>
<p>But I do think ppl get carried away with sequels these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/12/hancock-2-is-happening/comment-page-1/#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=10019#comment-9556</guid>
		<description>I hated this movie.  It went off into too many tangents, it feels uneven, unbalanced and light in the 1st half and jarringly heavy by the 2nd act. It was flooded with plot holes and I honestly don&#039;t think it warrants a sequel. So there... HMPH! (Crosses shoulders)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hated this movie.  It went off into too many tangents, it feels uneven, unbalanced and light in the 1st half and jarringly heavy by the 2nd act. It was flooded with plot holes and I honestly don&#8217;t think it warrants a sequel. So there&#8230; HMPH! (Crosses shoulders)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 26/34 queries in 0.018 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 696/697 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-02-09 22:09:07 -->
