<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Angels and Demons&#8217; &#8230; New Teaser Poster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/10/angels-and-demons-new-teaser-poster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/10/angels-and-demons-new-teaser-poster/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Reape</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/10/angels-and-demons-new-teaser-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-7863</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Reape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=6175#comment-7863</guid>
		<description>Gavin, I have to agree. Angels and Demons was definitely Brown&#039;s best book by far. (I didn&#039;t care too much for Deception Point, however). Anyway, is the movie is half as good as the book, we are in for a treat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavin, I have to agree. Angels and Demons was definitely Brown&#8217;s best book by far. (I didn&#8217;t care too much for Deception Point, however). Anyway, is the movie is half as good as the book, we are in for a treat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/10/angels-and-demons-new-teaser-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-7862</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=6175#comment-7862</guid>
		<description>This book I thought was the best of all of Brown&#039;s thus far (including Digital Fortress and Deception Point). But I am still don&#039;t believe that Hanks is Langdon. Before I even knew DaVinci Code was going to be a movie I always pictured Hugh Jackman as Langdon and thought he fit it much better than Hanks. But I am really looking forward to this one since in the first one they stayed pretty faithful to the book. This is a much better story overall than DaVinci, and with the latest hulla-balloo over CERNS particle accelerator (which is a large part of the plot) I think it will naturally hype itself and be even bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book I thought was the best of all of Brown&#8217;s thus far (including Digital Fortress and Deception Point). But I am still don&#8217;t believe that Hanks is Langdon. Before I even knew DaVinci Code was going to be a movie I always pictured Hugh Jackman as Langdon and thought he fit it much better than Hanks. But I am really looking forward to this one since in the first one they stayed pretty faithful to the book. This is a much better story overall than DaVinci, and with the latest hulla-balloo over CERNS particle accelerator (which is a large part of the plot) I think it will naturally hype itself and be even bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alldawayjay</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/10/angels-and-demons-new-teaser-poster/comment-page-1/#comment-7860</link>
		<dc:creator>alldawayjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=6175#comment-7860</guid>
		<description>Hopefully wont be as boring as The DaVinci Code</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully wont be as boring as The DaVinci Code</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 26/52 queries in 0.568 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 779/1095 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-02-10 04:04:32 -->
