<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is How &#8216;Dark Knight&#8217; Will Break &#8216;Titanic&#8217;s&#8217; Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 03:58:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Are Movie Geeks &#187; &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; Gets It&#8217;s Re-Release and Oscar Campaign</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/comment-page-1/#comment-9977</link>
		<dc:creator>We Are Movie Geeks &#187; &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; Gets It&#8217;s Re-Release and Oscar Campaign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=5507#comment-9977</guid>
		<description>[...] re-releasing &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; in theaters and IMAX on January 23rd, 2009. Â We reported a few months back that this was happening, but an official date wasn&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] re-releasing &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217; in theaters and IMAX on January 23rd, 2009. Â We reported a few months back that this was happening, but an official date wasn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/comment-page-1/#comment-7135</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=5507#comment-7135</guid>
		<description>I could definitely see people wanting to see it on IMAX again.  That is an amazing experience that cannot be duplicated by any home theater system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could definitely see people wanting to see it on IMAX again.  That is an amazing experience that cannot be duplicated by any home theater system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alldawayjay</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/comment-page-1/#comment-7129</link>
		<dc:creator>alldawayjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=5507#comment-7129</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Dark Knight&quot; may actually have a chance at surpassing &quot;Titanic&quot; with a January rerelease. January is known for being the slowest movie month of the year and most of the movies are never very successful (with the exception of this years &quot;Cloverfield&quot;). I feel that Warner Bros. would have a better chance of surpassing &quot;Titanic&quot;s record if they held off on releasing &quot;The Dark Knight&quot; on DVD in December. There&#039;s no question that it would not sell millions upon millions of DVD&#039;s no matter what month it was released. December is a major market for summer movie DVDs for obvious reasons, but unless some special unseen version of Knight is released in theatres, why would a big fan base want to see it again on the big screen to bring in that much money when they can simply just rent it and save gas and movie ticket prices?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221; may actually have a chance at surpassing &#8220;Titanic&#8221; with a January rerelease. January is known for being the slowest movie month of the year and most of the movies are never very successful (with the exception of this years &#8220;Cloverfield&#8221;). I feel that Warner Bros. would have a better chance of surpassing &#8220;Titanic&#8221;s record if they held off on releasing &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221; on DVD in December. There&#8217;s no question that it would not sell millions upon millions of DVD&#8217;s no matter what month it was released. December is a major market for summer movie DVDs for obvious reasons, but unless some special unseen version of Knight is released in theatres, why would a big fan base want to see it again on the big screen to bring in that much money when they can simply just rent it and save gas and movie ticket prices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/comment-page-1/#comment-7124</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=5507#comment-7124</guid>
		<description>If a January rerelease of &#039;Dark Knight&#039; doesn&#039;t push the domestic gross past &#039;Titanic,&#039; well, I will be really surprised. 

If the film performs 1 million and above during the weekends, Warner Bros. will keep it in theatersâ€¦ so, it&#039;s at about 515 million. Only 85 million left to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a January rerelease of &#8216;Dark Knight&#8217; doesn&#8217;t push the domestic gross past &#8216;Titanic,&#8217; well, I will be really surprised. </p>
<p>If the film performs 1 million and above during the weekends, Warner Bros. will keep it in theatersâ€¦ so, it&#8217;s at about 515 million. Only 85 million left to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/09/this-is-how-dark-knight-will-break-titanics-record/comment-page-1/#comment-7123</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=5507#comment-7123</guid>
		<description>and the story also goes on to say &quot;But with the title set to hit DVD in December, it&#039;s now apparent anyone hoping the Batman sequel would soar to &quot;Titanic&quot; heights will be disappointed. &quot;Dark Knight&quot; already ranks as the second-highest-grossing movie ever, after &quot;Titanic&#039;s&quot; phenomenal $1.84 billion -- a mix of $600.8 million in domestic boxoffice and $1.24 billion in foreign coin registered in 1997 and 1998.&quot; It&#039;ll come close, to be sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the story also goes on to say &#8220;But with the title set to hit DVD in December, it&#8217;s now apparent anyone hoping the Batman sequel would soar to &#8220;Titanic&#8221; heights will be disappointed. &#8220;Dark Knight&#8221; already ranks as the second-highest-grossing movie ever, after &#8220;Titanic&#8217;s&#8221; phenomenal $1.84 billion &#8212; a mix of $600.8 million in domestic boxoffice and $1.24 billion in foreign coin registered in 1997 and 1998.&#8221; It&#8217;ll come close, to be sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 27/35 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 723/723 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-24 22:52:42 -->
