<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: &#8216;The Dark Knight&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/review-the-dark-knight-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/review-the-dark-knight-3/</link>
	<description>All things movies... as noted by geeks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/review-the-dark-knight-3/comment-page-1/#comment-22840</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=3980#comment-22840</guid>
		<description>[&quot;Maggie Gyllenhaal replaces Katie Holmes as Dawes, and does a substantially more realistic and effective job as Wayne and Dent&#8217;s object of affection. She doesn&#8217;t feel forced and we can feel her heartbreak in the film.&quot;] 
 
No, she doesn&#039;t.  I realize that many of you dislike Tom Cruise, but why take it out on his wife?  Frankly, I think that Katie Holmes got the better deal.  Both her and Gyllenhaal were solid as Rachel Dawes.  But whereas Holmes was able to portray Rachel as the moral voice of Gotham,  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&quot;Maggie Gyllenhaal replaces Katie Holmes as Dawes, and does a substantially more realistic and effective job as Wayne and Dent&rsquo;s object of affection. She doesn&rsquo;t feel forced and we can feel her heartbreak in the film.&quot;] </p>
<p>No, she doesn&#039;t.  I realize that many of you dislike Tom Cruise, but why take it out on his wife?  Frankly, I think that Katie Holmes got the better deal.  Both her and Gyllenhaal were solid as Rachel Dawes.  But whereas Holmes was able to portray Rachel as the moral voice of Gotham,  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuturmouth</title>
		<link>http://wearemoviegeeks.com/2008/07/review-the-dark-knight-3/comment-page-1/#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>shuturmouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wearemoviegeeks.com/?p=3980#comment-4140</guid>
		<description>I saw this today and it to me goes down as the best superhero/comic book movie ever made. It also goes down as one of the best sequels along with T2, Aliens, Empire Strikes Back, and The Godfather part 2. Ledgers performance will go down as one of the best movie villans ever on screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this today and it to me goes down as the best superhero/comic book movie ever made. It also goes down as one of the best sequels along with T2, Aliens, Empire Strikes Back, and The Godfather part 2. Ledgers performance will go down as one of the best movie villans ever on screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 27/32 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 672/672 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wearemoviegeeks.com

Served from: wearemoviegeeks.com @ 2012-05-24 17:46:55 -->
